509-495-1246 www.AlbrechtLawFirm.com
September 2020
Don’t Feed the Vengeful Wolf Let’s Leave Room for Each Other to Fail This Fall
By the time you read this newsletter, the Albrecht Law Firm team will be back together in our brand-new office! As I write this, our sign has just been raised and we’re getting closer to having so much more space for us to work and help our clients. This includes high-tech conference rooms, focus group and deposition rooms, and additional space for other businesses to grow in the building with us. We have many precautions in place to protect our clients, but we are all looking forward to returning to some sense of normalcy in the office together. As we return to a new normal and many parts of our world reopen, I believe we need to be careful about how we approach our conversations with others. This pandemic pushed most of us into our homes for weeks on end, and many are still being very cautious. Human interaction outside of our home isn’t something we have had to do on a consistent basis for quite some time.
And current events haven’t made this transition any easier.
first published in a book in 1978 and mislabeled. Regardless, it offers a powerful perspective on grace.
Lately, we all seem to disagree with one another. Our social media profiles and conversations with others seem to center around choosing a side or criticizing the actions of others. We’ve begun to expect perfection — or what we view as perfection. For example, there are mass protests across our nation and globe surrounding police brutality and racism. Some have been peaceful. Some have been violent. Some have even been necessary. Regardless, everyone seems to disagree with everyone on one thing or another, and we’re gravitating toward those whom we agree with, rather than learning from those with whom we don’t agree. I’ve noticed that when we sit down for a meal with someone or spend an afternoon with them, the conversation gravitates toward things we have in common. We avoid the heavy-handed component of the conversation, which could be our opposing views. I’m guilty of this, too. No one wants to stay in the discomfort of disagreement. However, once online, we unleash our disagreements and launch into Facebook fights where we can carefully hide behind our phones. Now, we’re smart people. I believe we could easily succeed in finding others we have disagreements with and yet have a civil relationship, respect them, listen to their viewpoints, and tactfully and respectfully respond. This seems to be an attribute we have lost.
The allegory focuses on a grandfather who is sharing a lesson with his grandson. He explains that all humans have two wolves fighting inside of them. One is evil; it’s angry, vengeful, greedy, and arrogant. The other wolf is good. It embodies joy, peace, love, empathy, and kindness. When the grandson asks which wolf will win, his grandfather responds, “The one you feed.” We need to have tough conversations face to face (safely, of course), and while doing so, we must engage in feeding the kind wolf, not the vengeful wolf. This allows us to see each other for what we are: human. We can’t hide behind our avatars. We have to see the flaws, the emotions, the reactions, and the details that make us human before we attempt an onslaught. It’s a far better recipe for adding value to your relationships or moving from a conversation to a new friendship. Returning to a new normal this fall and starting to come together in person again will not be easy. But we can lessen the divide by showing each other a little grace and feeding our good wolf. Remember: We’re all going to fail. We’re not going to agree on everything, but we can learn from each other.
I’m reminded of an allegory I learned as a child. Some say it originated from Native American or First Nation folklore, while others claim it was
www.AlbrechtLawFirm.com | 1
WHAT IS AGE BUT A NUMBER? A Dutch Man’s Quest to Change His Legal Age
that came with being 69. Ratelband even went as far as to say he would be willing to delay his pension benefits another 20 years if need be.
In 2018, Dutch native Emile Ratelband was 69 years old. The thing was that the motivational speaker and founder of the Ratelband Research Institute didn’t want to be 69. So, he went to a Dutch court and petitioned for the right to change his legal age. His intention was to change the year of birth on his birth certificate — bumping it up by 20 years. As a result, all records would show him as 49.
In an interview with Dutch newspaper Algemeen Dagblad, Ratelband said, “When I’m 69, I am limited. If I’m 49, then I can buy a new house, drive a different car. I can take up more work. When I’m on Tinder and it says I’m 69, I don’t get an answer. When I’m 49, with the face I have, I will be in a luxurious position.” Interestingly enough, Ratelband’s request wasn’t dismissed outright by the court. The judge foundmerit in the argument and said that people desire to change things about themselves all the time, adding that maybe age was one of those things we should consider —“maybe”being the operative word. The court ultimately decided that “Ratelband is at liberty to feel 20 years younger than his real age and to act accordingly.” But the judge added that changing his legal documents would have “undesirable legal and societal implications.”The court added “[T]here are a variety of rights and duties related to age, such as the right to vote and the duty to attend school. If Mr. Ratelband’s request was allowed, those age requirements would become meaningless.” Today, Ratelband is 71 and continues his battle to change his age. While he may have lost in his initial quest to legally change his age, according to NPR, he intends to appeal the decision.
Why did Ratelband want to change his age?
He told the court he didn’t feel like a man who was going on 70. He said he felt good — he felt like a man 20 years younger. He even said his doctors agreed and that they’d told him he had the body of someone younger. But there was another major reason Ratelband wanted to change his age. He said doing so would increase his overall happiness and would be helpful on dating apps. He would no longer have to deal with the ageism
Is Stress Harming Your Memory? How to Cope With Daily Triggers
overworked. Plus, studies have found that multitasking is not effective. You cannot deliver the same results when your attention is scattered as you can when you are focused on one thing. To make matters worse, multitasking takes a major toll on memory and cognition, according to a study from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. If stress is impairing your memory, judgment, or cognition, take the above steps to reduce it. If you find your memory and cognition aren’t improving, consider speaking with a mental health professional to discuss your best next steps. Mental health and stress management are important, and the more we do to improve these areas of our lives, the healthier and happier we will be.
Stress can cause more than just a bad mood and low energy. Over time, mental exhaustion from stress can lead to forgetfulness and reduced cognition. This can hamper your ability to do your job and enjoy life. Though stress is unavoidable, there are steps you can take to mitigate some of the negative effects of mental exhaustion, including forgetfulness. First, consider the source of your stress. These days, a common stressor is social media. If your feeds are full of bad news and negativity, shut them down. Many researchers suggest that spending less time on the internet leads to better health. Several studies have found that constant internet use, including time spent on social media, is negatively impacting our memories. Research from Harvard, Oxford, King’s College London, and Western Sydney University all confirm this: Too much internet use is a bad thing. Of course, it can be easier to delete a social media app than it is to eliminate other types of stressors. Coping with a stressful coworker, for example, can be difficult. You have to figure out why they’re causing you stress and how the situation can be remedied. Dealing with a work-related confrontation can be hard, but having that difficult conversation and resolving the problem can ultimately lead to less long-term stress and improve your mental health. Another thing you can do to reduce stress is avoid multitasking. Taking on multiple projects or doing too much in too little time can leave you feeling
2 | 509-495-1246
TAKE A BREAK
For centuries, Europeans used the Julian calendar, created by Julius Caesar in 46 B.C. It was based on the solar calendar, so most of Europe thought it was the most accurate calendar. However, over the centuries, dates had “drifted,” and many important days, like Easter and the spring equinox, were no longer falling on the dates they were supposed to. To compensate, the new Gregorian calendar was developed and put to use by Pope Gregory XIII in 1582. It helped put things back in order and eliminated the extra day every 128 years. However, not everyone adopted the Gregorian calendar right away, such as the British. That meant that Europeans were using two diverging calendars for over 200 years. Talk about confusing! People realized that as the world started to expand and as countries became more connected, having a single calendar system was critical. Finally, the British chose the year 1752 to make the change. But, in order to make it work, they had to “jump” forward. For instance, 1751 could only be 10 months long — starting with March and ending with Dec. 31, 1751. But even that adjustment didn’t quite bring the English up to speed in time to make the shift. They also had to cut 11 days from 1752. The unlucky dates that were cut were Sept. 2–14, 1752. The people were not happy. English historians found research that British citizens chanted “Give us our 11 days!” in the streets. The phrase became so popular that some politicians even campaigned with that as their slogan. Several other historical accounts state that many people were worried that by cutting the calendar, their own lives would be cut 11 days shorter. There was a lot of confusion and chaos, but over time, dates fell where they were supposed to, and everyone lived their full lives, those 11 days included. 11 DAYS DELETED FROM HISTORY How the British Changed Their Calendar System and Caused Chaos
DIY DOG-FRIENDLY DOUGHNUTS
Inspired by SunnyDayFamily.com
Want to show your dog that they’re a very good boy or girl? Try this recipe for a tasty treat your dog will go nuts for!
Ingredients
For topping •
For doughnuts • 1 cup flour • 1 cup oats •
Greek yogurt
• Bacon bits Special equipment • Doughnut pan
1/3 cup coconut oil
1/2 cup xylitol-free peanut butter
•
•
2 eggs
Directions
1. Preheat the oven to 375 F. Lightly spray doughnut pan with cooking spray and set aside. 2. In a large bowl, combine all doughnut ingredients and mix well. 3. Transfer dough to doughnut pan. Use your hands to tightly pack each mold. 4. Bake doughnuts for 14 minutes. Carefully remove from the oven and allow to cool completely. 5. To decorate your doughnut treats, place Greek yogurt in a small, wide bowl. Dip each doughnut in yogurt and sprinkle with bacon bits. 6. Place decorated doughnuts in the freezer for 10 minutes for the yogurt to harden. Serve straight from the freezer to your hungry dogs.
AlbrechtLawFirm.com | 3 AlbrechtLawFirm.com |
PRST STD US POSTAGE PAID BOISE, ID PERMIT 411
509-495-1246 www. AlbrechtLawFirm.com 421W. Riverside Ave., Ste. 614 Spokane, WA 99201 INSIDE THIS ISSUE
Finding Grace in Response to Failure 1
Should You Be Able to Change Your Legal Age? Is Stress Making You Forgetful?
2
When You Give a Dog a Doughnut How 11 Days Were Deleted From History
3
4
Did You Know Lucille Ball Saved ‘Star Trek’?
BEAM ME UP, LUCY How Lucille Ball Saved ‘Star Trek’ in the 1960s
a replacement, and two potential shows hit Ball’s desk: “Star Trek” and “Mission: Impossible.” In 1965, Ball took the pitches to her longtime network collaborator, CBS. They said no to “Star Trek” (but yes to “Mission: Impossible”), but Ball wasn’t about to give up on this new science fiction show, so she took it to NBC. The network was skeptical at first but ordered a pilot. The pilot starred Jeffrey Hunter as Captain Pike and Leonard Nimoy as Mr. Spock. There was no James T. Kirk to be found — not yet, anyway. The pilot, titled “The Cage,”was a disappointment. NBC executives weren’t about to put it on air, but they decided to order a second pilot after Ball agreed to help finance it.
Did you know that Lucille Ball — the iconic comedian best known for her 1950s show“I Love Lucy”— is the reason “Star Trek” exists today? Ball was a Hollywood force in the ‘50s and ‘60s, and she produced hit after hit with her production company. In fact, Desilu, co-founded by Ball and her then-husband, Desi Arnaz, was responsible for hits like “The Andy Griffith Show” and “The Dick Van Dyke Show.” The two were partners in the company until their divorce in 1960, and in 1962, Ball took over Arnaz’s share. In that moment, Ball became one of the most powerful women in Hollywood, and Desilu, one of the biggest independent production companies at the time, had a lot of pull in the industry. In 1963, one of Desilu’s biggest hits was coming to an end. “The Untouchables” was a crime drama starring Robert Stack. Ball needed
Leonard Nimoy as Spock. NBC executives liked what they saw. The new pilot, titled “Where No Man Has Gone Before,”was put on NBC’s fall schedule, though it wasn’t the first episode aired on NBC. That honor went to the episode titled “The Man Trap,”which aired on Sept. 8, 1966. While Gene Roddenberry’s original “Star Trek” only lasted three seasons, it went on to become a major TV and film franchise. One of its recent iterations, “Star Trek: Discovery,” is about to enter its third season on the streaming service CBS All Access — all because Lucille Ball saw potential in a little show back in 1965.
The second pilot starredWilliam Shatner as Captain Kirk, and he was joined again by
4 | 509-495-1246
Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online