Populo Volume 2 Issue 1

(1976) to demonstrate three ways in which someone can be silenced. She (Langton,

1993, pp. 315) then identifies the final type of silencing, illocutionary disablement as

the way in which pornography silences women.

The first way in which a speaker could be silenced occurs when no utterance or

locutionary act is made or attempted, this is often due to fear or intimidation. An

example of this can be seen in the scenario where A threatens B, and says, “Do not tell

C whe re we are otherwise, I will kill your family”. In this example, B has been

locutionary silenced, they are prevented from making the utterance of saying where

they are. The second type of silencing is known as perlocutionary frustration

(Langton, 1993, pp. 315). Perlocutionary frustration occurs when an utterance is made

but the perlocutionary act (the resulting effect of the locutionary and illocutionary

acts) isn’t as the speaker intended. For example, if Jim invited Jonah to church but

Jonah does not go as he didn’t think that Jim was sincere in his intention of inviting

him Jim can be said to have been silenced through perlocutionary frustration, as he

was prevented from achieving his intended perlocutionary effect of inviting Jonah to

church. The third and final way in which a speech act can be silenced is through

Illocutionary disablement (Langton, 1993, pp. 315). Illocutionary disablement

occurs when a speaker can utter words, however, the words fail not only in achieving

their desired aims but also fail to perform the speaker’s intended action (Langton,

1993, pp. 315). It is this type of silencing that Langton (1993) claims can explain the

harmful effects of pornography. Langton (1993, pp. 315-316) points out that cases of

illocutionary disablement occur in instances where the speaker’s authority is reduced,

causing them to be prevented from performing the relevant illocutionary act.

It is important here to highlight that the main difference between perlocutionary

frustration and illocutionary disablement is whether uptake is or is not secured.

Langton (1993, pp.320) suggests that uptake is only present in the case of

perlocutionary frustration. Using the case of a woman attempting to refuse sex,

60

Made with FlippingBook HTML5