Table 26. Context Sensitive Features of Selected Thoroughfare Plans
Jurisdiction Area types
Corridor Typology
Multimodal Elements in ROW
Design Types/Cross Sections
Application
Detailed network maps by planning area
Draft design criteria for new and reconfigured thoroughfares and basic and optional cross sections by area type
El Paso, Texas Compact Urban, Drivable Suburban, and Rural
Modal elements identified in basic and optional cross sections
Expressway, Principal Arterial, Minor Arterial, Collector
Draft suggests regional intergovernmental compact. Plans to add multimodal network & update cross sections
Typical section selection process uses inputs including modal elements to code a range of typical sections for each street type
Area types implicit in street type descriptions
Street Type Map (Activity, Commerce/Mixed-Use, Neighborhood Connector, Commercial Connector, and System Link); Lanes Map, Bicycle Network Map Transit Vision: Major Services map. Special corridor designations
MTP specifies a suite of cross-sections for each segment based on modal priorities and available ROW
MTP provides ample guidance and detailed procedures for flexibility
Fort Worth, Texas
Special districts with unique street types
State Highway System, Primary Multimodal Streets, Local Connector Streets, Rural Streets, Multimodal Connections (Trails and Shared-Use Paths) on Map 5.1 2040 Major Thoroughfare Map, with additional cross section variations in B3 code (13 street types) Freeway, Arterial, Collector (non-thoroughfare), Local (non-thoroughfare), Special Corridors (Beltline RR, Greenway) Includes arterials, plus Parkways, Primary Residential Streets, Business Streets, Industrial Streets, Country Roads, Country Arterials, and Rustic Roads and Exceptional Rustic Roads.
Place Types Nature, Rural, Neighborhood, Neighborhood Mix, Core, Employment Center, Civic Space, Planned Development District
Typical cross sections for functional classification and place types are shown in plan and B3 Code.
Modal elements depicted in cross sections
Bastrop, Texas
Standards in B3 Code are adjustable
Target widths and cross section elements identified in ROW Standards and Design Guidelines table for each road type, based on number of lanes, speeds and area type
The ROW Standards and Design Guidelines Table specifies modal elements for each combination
Indianapolis- Marion County
Context Areas: Compact and Metropolitan
Design guidelines are prototypical, not “one- size-fits-all”
Master Plan guides street design
Road Code: Urban, Suburban, Rural
Pedestrian priority areas, Transit components of the plan are mapped and considered in design
Montgomery County, Maryland
Context Sensitive Design Standards, cross sections, target speeds
Target speeds based on road classification and area types
110
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog