Finally, within the European Union, the advent of Gen AI has unsettled the lawmaking trajectory for the proposed AI Act, prompting a re-evaluation of how responsibilities are allocated to AI system providers and users. While the AI Act doesn't solely pertain to copyright legislation, EU legislators are currently contemplating the imposition of a mandate on providers of Gen AI systems. This mandate would necessitate the disclosure of a summary in which the utilization of training data subject to copyright protection is publicly outlined. Similarly, Japanese legislation does not expressly cover concerns related to AI-generated creations. However, the Japanese Copyright Act does encompass safeguards for derivative creations, which involve works founded upon or modified from pre-existing works. It remains plausible that a creation produced by AI might be classified as a derivative work, consequently qualifying for copyright protection. The question of ownership To further complicate the matter, laws and regulations protecting IP and copyright infringement can be influenced by many additional factors, including country-specific law. Applying copyright laws to Gen AI poses unique challenges, as different countries have different approaches to the copyright protection of AI-generated works — and others have no law regarding GenAI works at all. In the United States, copyright laws do not extend protection to works created solely by a machine. However, copyright protection may be granted if substantial human involvement can be demonstrated in the creation process.
To complicate the matter even further, not all AI-generated content falls under the purview of copyright law. For example, brief AI-generated phrases, produced regularly, typically lack the elements necessary for copyright protection. As such, they are generally exempt from the constraints of open-source licenses.
Sorting Human from Machine Content GenAI attribution tools can differentiate between AI-generated and human-generated content, which can be extremely important in creating clarity within areas such as intellectual property. But at the heart of GenAI attribution is the idea of crediting the content creators and owners of data used to train the models and form the outputted content by GenAI tools. As previously mentioned, the implications of ownership and copyright infringement within GenAI are legally not black and white. However, regulation will soon be implemented, giving attribution models more direction in adhering to requirements.
© 2023 Fractal Analytics Inc. All rights reserved
04
Made with FlippingBook - PDF hosting