Populo Volume 2 Issue 2

direct debit] to pay for their energy” (Octopus Energy, n.d. a),

explaining that the understanding of online internet deals gatekeeps

lower prices from that demographic.

3.5.2

Management also requires access to an, online, bank

account which Halfon declares: “Nearly 2 million households in

the UK do not have access to a bank account that has an overdraft

facility (2014, Para 5). Therefore, many Britons have no method of

accessing these cheaper rates, which is inherently unfair and

requires attention. This data was collected almost a decade ago so

figures may have altered.

3.6 Halfon claims that “administrative charges of sending out a bill

should not amount to more than 19p per head […] the average charge was

around £80 more per year” (2014, Para 3), though these figures are not

directly comparable, the impression that energy companies are charging

more than they spend by a high profit margin is transparently conveyed

and is unjust by principle.

3.7 A suggestion after consideration of the opposing arguments, would

be a slight reduction in direct debit after a year of patronage to promote

customer longevity, for the benefit of their guaranteed payments. This

then offsets extreme payment imbalance and reduces the damage to

households which cannot choose to pay by direct debit.

4. Should there be greater use of discounts on energy for those who live

closer to energy infrastructure?

4.1 These households require less infrastructure [less material, such as

pipe work or copper wiring] to connect them, so less material is used,

therefore the argument that standing charges should be reduced in a

58

Made with FlippingBook HTML5