Any action I take to defend myself and to recover my working life plays into the hands of my husband's campaign. Any actions taken against my partner and our company also hurt me, both emotionally and financially. Our company and our relationship have been irreparably damaged, and the police action has exponentially increased the risk of physical violence. My estranged husband is waging all-out war in a campaign of destruction. He has, over the years, destroyed every one of my relationships, and now this with my partner. He has nearly succeeded in virtual 'murder' with his depredations into my life after I escaped in 2015. My properties and most of my assets are lost with my estranged husband's assassinating my character with psychiatric quackery assertions and his statement to police and the courts that I had stolen money and a vehicle. Every relationship has been damaged or destroyed. The Magistrates Court and Victoria police enabled the domestic abuse of my estranged husband, which enabled him to take control of my assets during COVID19 in 2020. His manipulation of others, including the police, has sabotaged my business activities and made me homeless and destitute. I can no longer defend myself against the abuse: he has disrupted my work, and my rich & rewarding lifestyle, and I am denied access to assets, properties, and family heirlooms.
The Buoy Company
established September 2000
Destroyed by Police and Magistrate
Founder & Managing Director— BuoysnGirl: Maggie Marriott www.buoys.com.au
Page 1 of 40
The Buoy Company Destroyed by Police and Magistrate
Managing Director Maggie Marriott
© Maggie Marriott 21 Bosworth Rd Bairnsdale 3875 Victoria Australia www.buoys.com.au
Page 2 of 40
PM to a Facebook Friend offering accommodation…
Brian wrote about you in one of his 12 statements to Police 21. I am also concerned that with Ms Marriott ignoring the Court Order and appearing to be scouting for support from her new Facebook friends, that she may ask her new Facebook friend John WESTHORP, to break into my workplace. Mr Westhorp offering Ms Marriott his bolt cutters for the Bosworth Road factory's locked gates on 31* July 2020. Sale Police Station one of twelve statements 30 January 2021 3:15pm Constable Mick Maddy VP 43099. He arrested and charged me with stalking and put me on bail. It took Sale police over a year to realise they had no evidence and withdrew the charges. And then applied to the same magistrate that made the error in 20 Feb 2020, to revoke the invalid Personal Safety Order. Those SIX police briefs denied me the Escaping Family Violence payment. And my Barrister refused to continue with my application to have the Order revoked BECAUSE of the Criminal Charges. I have endured long periods of no income and isolation because of these charges. I’ve spent all my married life isolated from EVERYONE I am not going to let my husband get away with anymore of his absurd controlling actions that have caused death and destruction. I know you cannot understand the consequences (it’s taken me long enough) but I will not put anyone else in danger. So stop thinking about me, it’s just not possible, safe or desirable for me to be with you. There are enough warnings from these obsessive delusional men to make me think they will continue to do you harm. If you want to report it to the police quote Brian’s Statement at Sale Police Station 30 January 2021 Constable Mick Maddy VP43099. Brian is manipulated and controlled by my husband and his estranged wife and her boyfriend Peter Kaneen. (I believe he is known to Bairnsdale Police). John Marriott is an EVIL man. The other people in this conspiracy have got a lot to lose. -This makes them dangerous
Page 3 of 40
My Work Vehicle October 2018
My Work Vehicle Bairnsdale October 2018
Victoria Police LEAP Report: Margaret Marriott 1995–2021
3rd August 2019 Stawell Police Station POLICE BELIEVE AN INTERVENTION ORDER IS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THE AFM (Affected Family Member) AND HER PROPERTY 15th August 2019 Bairnsdale (LEAP Sub Incident Report) Summons served on the respondent by Bairnsdale Police on 15th August 2019. Confirmed Acting SGT B _ _ _ VP12345 The court orders that the respondent must not commit family violence against the protected persons. Note; the family violence protection act 2008 defines family violence As behaviour by a person towards a family member of that person that is physically or sexually abusive, emotionally or psychologically abusive, ECONOMICALLY abusive, THREATENING, coercive, or Page 4 of 40
in any other way CONTROLS or DOMINATES the family member and causes that family member to feel fear for the safety Or well- being of that family member. 24th September 2019 Stawell Magistrates Court FVIO K12030938 MCV STAWELL Magistrate Ms T_____ M_______ Affected Family Member MARRIOTT, MAGGIE
Any action I take to defend myself and to recover my working life plays into the hands of my estranged husbands' campaign. Any actions taken against my partner and our company also hurt me, both emotionally and financially. Our company and our relationship have been irreparably damaged, and the police action has exponentially increased the risk of physical violence.
Page 5 of 40
PERSO N AL SAFETY I N TERVE N TIO N ORDERS ACT
Chapter 1 all-out war in a campaign of destruction
Digital Real Estate Compromised Criminal Charges Ensued M y estranged husband is waging all-out war in a campaign of destruction. He has, over the years, destroyed every one of my relationships, and now this with my partner. He has nearly succeeded in virtual 'murder' with his depredations into my life after I escaped in 2015 from his attempts to sabotage every business activity. My properties and most of my assets are lost with my estranged husbands' assassinating my
Page 6 of 40
character with psychiatric quackery assertions and his statements by proxy, to police and the courts that I had stolen money and a vehicle. Every relationship has been damaged or destroyed. Magistrates Court and Victoria Police Mismanagement The Magistrates Court and Victoria police enabled the domestic abuse by my estranged husband, that enabled him to take control of my assets during COVID19 in 2020. His manipulation of others, including the police, has sabotaged my business activities and made me homeless and destitute. I can no longer defend myself against the abuse: he has disrupted my work, my rich & rewarding lifestyle, and I am denied access to assets, properties, family heirlooms. My company, personal belongings AND MY DOG have been stolen. Furthermore, the perpetrator is emboldened and validated by the mandate of the court after the Magistrate placed another invalid Personal Safety Order against me, which expires 2060, making it a criminal offence for me to go to my accommodation and workplace and to communicate with my life partner and my own personally owned domain and phone numbers, about our company. I can do nothing to defend myself against lies and false information. I can do nothing to make workplace claims. I can do nothing to protect against family violence as defined by the family law act. Police Process Validates And Emboldens Perpetrators My situation worsens with every one of my partner's interactions with the police and the court; he acts as a proxy for my estranged husband. The whole process validates and emboldens them both. So how can it possibly go from Stawell Police putting in place an FVIO K12030938 and Bairnsdale police refusing to enforce it; to an interim PSIO K1245066, six months later being a criminal offence for me to go to my own workplace and communicate with my partner and employee about our company business?
Page 7 of 40
Transported 2 hours handcuffed in a dog box—24 hrs in Custody What has been the dollar cost of the seventy plus magistrates hearings, four arrests, transporting me 100km’s handcuffed, lying on the floor of a divvie van, crying and traumatised, arriving at the Morwell Police station at 2:30 am and the 24 hrs in custody? There are well over 300 court-related documents, twelve statements to Police, providing false and delusional information. Three of the six or seven Briefs that I have been able to get hold of are 43, 44 and 103 pages. The screenshots of the offending posts are illegible. Police have failed consistently to supply the Briefs within the prescribed time of 14 days, and those that were supplied are illegible and have pages missing. Sixty Police Officers with Eyes On Water Police Constable Tara…30 something giving me, a matriarch, and managing director relationship advice … "it's not good for you to have his photo on your phone". Then she writes it up as the evidence to charge me with stalking and breaching the invalid PSO. Over 70 police have had eyes on. I'm not allowed to care for the man I loved - I’m supposed to want revenge or retribution. I've been trying to get help for him since April 2019. Police turned a male DV victim into a criminal, then they validated his paranoia, encouraged his delusions and made criminal charges against me. Police failed to investigate the first incident and discover the real perpetrator. Perpetrators Emboldened & Validated By Mandate Of A Bairnsdale Magistrate Furthermore, the perpetrators are emboldened and validated by the mandate of a Bairnsdale Magistrate after a Personal Safety Order against me and in place until 2060, making it a criminal offence for me to go to my residential workplace or communicate with my intimate partner and our shared company. In addition, an interim PSIO was placed against me six months after the existing FVIO was put in place. After that Interim PSO was struck out, another was applied for by my 'intimate partner' and then placed against me at the Hearing that I was unable to attend due to circumstances brought about by my partner and even though I notified the Magistrates Court about the situation. Page 8 of 40
Stalking And 98 Breaches Of A PSIO The promulgation of false information has misled police, and they have failed to verify or check the veracity of the statements contained in the briefs. Furthermore, the police officers who interviewed me did not understand technology or social media and acted on the false information. They arrested then charged me with stalking and 98 breaches of an invalid PSIO. I have transcribed the recordings of the three arrest interviews where police either fail to understand or refuse to accept my explanation. At every stage, police have told me they cannot help as it is a company - "you need a lawyer", they say to me, yet my partner's statements exclusively refer to workplace matters. Stawell Police identified an abusive event on August 4th 2019, as Family Violence. It was an abuse carried out by my estranged husband via the proxy of my partner. At least twelve statements have been made to police by my partner; they are contained in the briefs generated by police after they arrested then charged me with stalking and 98 breaches of a PSO. At no stage have police investigated or checked the veracity of the statements with me. Actually, all the accusations made against me are what has been done to me. Over 10,000 words have been given to the court and the police, assassinating my character. Lies and mischaracterisation have been used in a conspiracy to steal my assets and my company. In addition, my estranged husband is continuing his decades-old campaign to gain control over me and my assets. Every Relationship Destroyed Beginning in 1969, my husband has destroyed every one of my relationships; he had an affair with my mother after my father had befriended him when he came to teach at Sale Tech school. He had a sexual relationship with me when I was 16 or 17; he was thirty-one. I have never allowed him to direct my business activities or my company work. In 2017 I paid him $30 for his half share of the company that I founded and took on the liabilities he created after locking me out of our workplace and preventing me from earning a living.
Page 9 of 40
Application to Revoke the Personal Safety Order The lawyer's text in the recent Application to Revoke the Personal Safety Order does not accurately portray the situation. It gives no clue to the court that I am the managing director of the company that employs myself and my partner. It does not inform the court that the registered place of business of both my companies is the address that I am kept out of by the court's mandate until 2060. The following text more accurately describes the situation and is what should have been provided to the court. A friend authored the text, which the lawyer refused to include in place of their own. Accurate Portrayal Required to Prevent Further Actions "I SEEK TO HAVE THIS ORDER REVOKED AS IT HAS DENIED ME ACCESS TO MY ASIC REGISTERED PLACE OF BUSINESS SO I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO EARN AN INCOME FOR 2 YEARS. MY REGISTERED PLACE OF BUSINESS IS ALSO WHERE I RESIDE. THIS ORDER HAS LEFT ME HOMELESS AND DESTITUTE RELYING ON THE KINDNESS OF STRANGERS AND CHARITIES. THE FIRST PSO APPLICATION WAS STRUCK OUT. IT WAS AN INTERIM PLACED DURING THE EXISTING FAMILY VIOLENCE ORDER K12030938 IN WHICH I AM THE PROTECTED PERSON, HAVING BEEN LOCKED OUT BY CHAIN AND PADLOCK FROM MY RESIDENCE AND BUSINESS AND PHYSICALLY THREATENED BY THE COMPLAINANT. THIS ORDER DENIES ME A SAFE ENVIRONMENT DURING COVID AND DENIES ME ANY RIGHT TO USE MY ASSETS, PROPERTY AND PERSONAL POSSESSIONS. THE ORDER ALSO PREVENTS ME PROCEEDING WITH MY WORKCOVER CLAIM FOR THE PSYCHOSOCIAL INJURY SUSTAINED IN MY WORKPLACE FROM ONGOING BULLYING AND HARASSMENT BY THE COMPLAINANT - MY BUSINESS AND LIFE PARTNER I NEED TO BE ALLOWED TO ACCESS MY LIFE IN MY HOME AND FACTORY SO I CAN RESUME MY BUSINESS ONCE MORE IN A LAW-ABIDING FASHION, BUT CANNOT DO SO WHILE THIS ORDER IS IN PLACE.”
Page of 10 40
Lawyer Authored Text: I SEEK TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE PREMISES THAT IS LEASED BY MY JOINTLY OWNED COMPANY,S THAT I ONCE MORE HAVE A SAFE PLACE TO LIVE AND AM NO LONGER HOMELESS. I DID NOT HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR AT COURT AT THE FINALISATION OF THIS ORDER DUE TO MY DIRE FINANCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THIS WAS A RESULT OF BEING DENIED THE OPPORTUNITY THE ACCESS ASSETS AND PROFITS FROM THE COMPANY I JOINTLY OWN WITH THE PROTECTED PERSON. MY CAR WAS UNREGISTERED AT THE TIME, I WAS UNABLE TO PAY THE REGISTRATION FEE AND I WAS AS SUCH UNABLE TO DRIVE TO THE HEARING. I NOTIFIED THE COURT OF THIS BUT THE ORDER WAS FINALISED IN MY ABSENCE. THE ORDER EXCLUDES ME FROM ANY PLACE THE PROTECTED PERSON WORKS. THE PROTECTED PERSON CURRENTLY WORKS AT A PREMISES WHICH IS LEASED BY THE COMPANY JOINTLY OWNED BY MYSELF AND THE PROTECTED PERSON. IT WOULD ORDINARILY BE MY PLACE OF RESIDENCE, AND EXCLUSION FROM IT IS RENDERED ME HOMELESS AND LIVING IN MY CAR. I'M A 62 YEAR OLD WOMAN AND IN A VERY VULNERABLE AND UNSAFE POSITION. 10 Extracts from one of the eight statements the Respondent has 1 made to the police. 7. On the 11th November 2020 at an unpublished time, Ms Marriott breached the IVO by communicating to me via a LinkedIn invitation. The also invitation contained a serious threat directed at me, warning that 'you will pay the price' if I don't withdraw the Personal Safety Order against her. Ms Marriott threatens to make a claim to the Family Court and to Workcover. He is 'paying the price' for his actions against me. My husband is destroying my financial base which is intertwined with his. I warned him that Centrelink required me to report the situation to ASIC. I had commenced the WorkCover Claim and he had taken all my documents along with my laptops and my work vehicle.
twelve statements that I know of 1
Page of 11 40
On the 9th of December 2020 Ms Marriott breached the IVO by committing a prohibited behaviour in harassing me, with Ms Marriott following through with her 11th November 2020 threat to make a claim to Workcover, if I did not request of the Magistrates Court for the IVO to be withdrawn. My husband has somehow been able to direct my partner to abuse by proxy. It is as if my husband is channelling through my partner. Ms Marriott subsequently and falsely claimed to Workcover that her mental health issues were due to her 2019 employment by Smart Buoy Co P/L. Specifically, my 3rd August 2019 repossession of the company Toyota Tundra, which was stolen by Ms Marriott from my Eagle Point home, sometime between 11pm Saturday 6th July 2019 and 6am Sunday 7th July 2019. It is my work vehicle. Police have never investigated. I did email proof of this to the court. Ms Marriott's claim to Workcover was rejected as being due to her own serious misconduct, following an independent psychiatrist assessment and an independent investigation. Ms Marriott's actions in making this false and retaliatory Workcover claim, required me as the employer to perform more than three days of compiling the employer response and interviews, along with this false claim creating considerable stress, apprehension and a fear that her vindictive reprisal for my lawful dismissing of her employment, will never end unless the Court order is enforced. Once again, Police have never investigated; he cannot dismiss me from my employment. I am the company manager; one of my many roles is employment. My husband and my partner have alleged that I have mental health issues, schizophrenia and Bipolar to many, many people. They have done it in writing and in meetings with business associates, employees, my adult children, Facebook friends. I have documentary evidence. WorkCover claim for a psychosocial injury My WorkCover claim is for a psychosocial injury, which I sustained from the actions taken against me after I reported an incident to Stawell police, which Police identified as Domestic Violence. However, I have documented the instances of workplace bullying and harassment, that I have been subjected to since 2018 in our workplace. A person, through their bullying behaviour, may be guilty of an offence under the OHS Act. However, the employer and other individuals may have breached the OHS Act by their failure to take action against bullying behaviour. For example, the employer has failed to take all reasonably Page of 12 40
practicable steps to provide and maintain a working environment that is safe and without risks to health associated with bullying or as a result of failing to respond to bullying behaviour, an employee, including a manager or supervisor, has acted in a way that fails to take reasonable care for the health and safety of others at a Workplace Workplace. Bullying Definition Workplace bullying is repeated, unreasonable behaviour directed at an employee or group of employees that creates a risk to health and safety. Employers have a responsibility under the OHS Act to maintain a workplace that is safe and without risks to psychological and physical health and safety, so far as is reasonably practicable. Complaints that are not true and made to cause harm or distress are known as vexatious or malicious complaints. If a report of bullying is found to be vexatious or malicious, disciplinary action or counselling may be considered against the person who made the report. The Personal Safety Order Act and the Family Violence Act both state that a Magistrate cannot place a Personal Order against a family member. The Personal Safety Order Act family member has the meaning given in section 8 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008; family violence intervention order means a family violence intervention order within the meaning of section 11 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008; For the purposes of this Act, harassment means a course of conduct by a person towards another person that is demeaning, derogatory or intimidating and includes such conduct that is carried on by or through a third person. 5 Meaning of prohibited behaviour (c) harassment; or (d) property damage or interference; or Meaning of property damage or interference For the purposes of this Act, property damage or interference means repeated, intentional— (a) damage to, or destruction of, any property of a person, including a person's pet; (b) substantial interference with any property of a person, including withholding any property of a person;
Page of 13 40
(c) threats to damage, destroy or substantially interfere with any property of a person. 9 Meaning of serious threat For the purposes of this Act, a serious threat means— (a) a threat to kill, within the meaning of section 20 of the Crimes Act 1958; 10 Meaning of stalking (1) A person (the first person) stalks another person (the second person) if the first person engages in a course of conduct— (a) with the intention of causing physical or mental harm to the second person, including self-harm, or of arousing apprehension or fear in the second person for his or her own safety or that of any other person; and (iv) causing an unauthorised computer function (within the meaning of Subdivision 6 of Division 3 of Part I of the Crimes Act 1958) in a computer owned or used by the second person or any other person; 16A Registrar must refuse to accept the application (1) If an application for a personal safety intervention order is made to the Magistrates' Court, a registrar must refuse to accept the application for filing if the registrar is satisfied that— (a) the application is frivolous, vexatious, without substance, made in bad faith, has no reasonable prospect of success or is an abuse of process; or (b) the matter would be more appropriately dealt with by mediation. (b) whether the applicant has made a report of the matter to police; and (5) Any guidelines issued under this section must be published on the Internet site of the Department of Justice. 19 Service of application As soon as practicable after an application for a personal safety intervention order is made, the appropriate registrar for the court must serve the application on— (a) the respondent; and
Page of 14 40
Seventy Magistrates Hearings— Sixty police have eyes on Over sixty police have eyes on the matter, twelve statements to 2 3 police by my partner. I have been subjected to a Tsunami of abuse, and never once have I had help from police, lawyers, magistrates or DV services. I have spent $60,000 (all my Super) on the expectation that the FVIO would mean that my keys, passwords and the return of my online and offline world would be returned to me. Yet here I am two years later, stuck in a vortex of legal proceedings, facing jail because my narrative is never heard. My estranged husbands' actions have meant the loss of everything, my assets, my working life, my future prosperity AND MY DOG! He has destroyed every relationship, and my relationship with my partner is the latest. Any actions taken against my partner and our company also hurt me, both emotionally and financially. Our company and our relationship have been irreparably damaged, and the police action has exponentially increased the risk of physical violence. Any action I take to defend myself and to recover my working life plays into the hands of my husbands' campaign. “A Vortex Of Legal Proceedings, Facing Jail Because My Narrative Is Never Heard” For the fourth time, next Tuesday 28th August, at 10:00 am, Police have told me to present to a police station to be arrested as my partner has made more claims of breaches to the PSO, that will make nine statements to police. As I am on bail, I will be held on remand until 23rd November due to the criminal charges. Hearing which was adjourned from May. Lawyers have not had time to go over my case. Police failed to supply briefs within the mandated 14 days, and when some of the briefs were supplied there were pages missing and much of it is illegible. This saga has been unravelling since August 2019 when Stawell Police identified the actions instigated by my estranged husband as Family Violence.
spreadsheet listing over 70 officers rank & VP number 2 12 statements 3 Page of 15 40
The charges relate to 98 breaches of the personal safety order, which by mandate of the Magistrates Court makes it a criminal offence to go to my residential workplace, the Registered Place Of Business of my company, and communicate with my partner and our company. The Personal Safety Order is in place until 2060. Charges of breaching the PSIO include: making a Workcover claim and posts to FaceBook and LinkedIn, which he claims are about him BUT ARE NOT ABOUT HIM. He states I posted a photo of his work vehicle when it is a photo of my work vehicle. He also states I am a work colleague and the bookkeeper who he has dismissed for serious misconduct. I am the Company Manager, deemed director and much more, of our shared company founded twenty years ago - by me. Other alleged breaches relate to my Flickr Cloud photo storage account. My partner could only see those photos because he has two of my three laptops. When I recovered my password in March 2020, the Flickr Windows Auto uploaded 950 image files from the documents folder. Many files accidentally uploaded were screenshots of documents relating to my partner. He stated I posted photos to Flickr. One of the image files was the advice sent to me by Stawell Police that he was charged with Make Threats to Kill. Gippsland Police failed to hold a summary Case Conference. Emotionally And Financially Intertwined Since becoming intimate partners in 2015, I shared my working life with my partner, so our lives are emotionally and financially intertwined. As the managing director and company manager, I have a Duty of Care to my partner. His statements contain lies and false, misleading information. I had attempted to get help for him since April 2019 when I approached the department of Justice mediation centre in Morwell.
Page of 16 40
Police have arrested me three times when an event instigated by my estranged husband caused my partner to be arrested in August 2019. In addition, police have charged me with stalking. Why was my partner at the police station at the exact time I have been told to present myself be interviewed at the Sale police station so they could arrest me? My partner was at the station, engaging in ‘Bro Talk’ with the constable. Both of them laughing at my partners comment about me. And then months later I am arrested again and charged with stalking and breaching the PSO at the police station! In his statements to police, he requests more than once that I be remanded. Go figure because I cannot. I cannot comprehend how I can defend myself against this escalating abuse carried out by proxy using Victoria Police on behalf of my estranged husband. I am slowly dying. Police failed to identify the perpetrator. He has taken everything, totally decimated my life, wrecked every relationship, only one I have recovered, and that is with my sister. She is a witness to my husband’s isolation tactics. I withstood his ridiculous sabotaging of my business activities for many years. I believed I had escaped him in 2015 when I moved my company and manufacturing to the other side of the state. I had no comprehension of the damage he was continuing to wrought upon me and my new relationship. Arrested, Transported Handcuffed in the Middle of The N ight Not in my wildest dreams did I think I could be arrested, held in custody, transported, handcuffed, lying in the back of a divvy van, arriving at police cells at 2:20 am! Passwords changed, my 20-year- old email and phone numbers, online life, and digital assets were all taken over. I am, smudged out by defamation, and after they took my dog and sabotaged every effort I made to continue earning. Homeless & Destitute by Mandate of Bairnsdale Magistrates Court I have been silenced and abandoned in a pandemic by mandate of the Bairnsdale Magistrates Court and done so easily using defamation and taking my technology. Police have acted for the perpetrators by charging me with breaching a PSIO for posting on Page of 17 40
Facebook, LinkedIn, and a Workcover claim. And after directing me to present myself to the police station, where unbelievably, the 'Protected Person' was in attendance, then by his request, police charged me with stalking. The eight statements made by the 'protected person' are full of delusional and paranoid thinking. Over forty Victoria Police have had eyes on, not one of them has investigated or asked for my views; instead, they have carried on the abuse on behalf of the perpetrator and vigorously pursued me, to the point of destruction. Indictable offences Indictable offences can range from theft, cause injury and drug offences to more serious matters such as rape, armed robbery, murder and treason. See the Crimes Act 1958 for information about offences deemed as indictable. Some indictable offences may be heard in the Magistrates' Court by way of summary hearing in the same way as summary offences are heard – your lawyer can advise you if this applies to your offences. See the summary offences page . Summary Offences Summary offences are usually less serious offences. They are heard by a judicial officer in the Magistrates’ Court rather than by a judge and/or jury. If you have been charged with a summary offence, you should seek legal advice. 2015 at husbands request Police removed me from my workplace My estranged husband, who in 2015 had police remove me from our workplace, has instigated actions that have ensued the loss of my three properties, a business, my personal assets, vehicles, household assets, company assets, my digital real estate, a rich and rewarding lifestyle, AND MY DOG. Online Activities Compromised My online activities are compromised, and soon, I will lose what remains of my freedom. As I am on bail, I will be held on remand until the 23rd November hearing for the criminal charges of Stalking and 98 PSO breaches. The breaches are for posting on FaceBook, Page of 18 40
sending text messages to my own phone number, which he has taken, making a WorkCover claim, coming within 5m of the protected person at the police station after police told me to go to the station. I drove 200kms to arrive, finding my partner in attendance and joking about me with the Police Officer. Bairnsdale Police Station Family Violence is N ot Just Physical Posters On 16th August 2019 at the Bairnsdale police station, I saw eight posters about ‘Family Violence is not just physical’. Police in Bairnsdale consistently refused to discuss the FVIO K12030938 24 dated September 2019, where I am the protected person. Police gave me various excuses as to why they could not help me, which included: 1. that I needed a lawyer as it was a company matter. 2. There is no Order 3. There is an order against you (the interim PSIO K12415066 was not placed 20 th February 2020 five months after the FVIO was in place) 4. You will have to apply for a Variation ( I did that and the police prosecutor took over the Hearing, once again I was not able to speak 5. Its a civil matter 6. You need to change the address on your license with VicRoads Police arrested me three times and charged me with stalking and 98 breaches of an invalid Personal Safety Order. 1. The Registrar accepted an application for a Personal Safety Order from my partner, defined in The Family Law Act as a ‘Family Member’. 2. The magistrate made the application into an Interim Order when there was an existing FVIO
Page of 19 40
3. An FVIO prevails over a PSIO and yet I was arrested for a breach of the PSIO when my partner was in breach, and not only for approaching within 5m, but he was driving my vehicle, 4. His behaviour is economically abusive 5. He has communicated about me by email 6. He uses the Police to locate me 7. His statements to police and the court are threatening His actions have me 1. fearing for my safety and wellbeing 2. resulted in the loss of my three properties 3. have taken away my freedom of speech 4. caused me to be homeless 5. Prevented me from making a WorkCover Claim 6. Denied me ‘safe Haven’ in a pandemic 7. Isolated me from family, friends and my business activities 8. Taken my freedom 9. Destroyed my rich and rewarding life FVIO K12030938 Protected Person Margaret Marriott 24 September 2019 Why is it that Bairnsdale & Sale Police are hostile to me and refused to recognise the Stawell Polices FVIO? Is there a code on the police computers that causes the hostility?
TO THE ACCUSED
Address is incorrect Details of the Charge against you.
The accused at Bairnsdale between 2 nd February 2021 and 1 st April did stalk another person namely X by engaging in a course of conduct which included publishing on social media and communicating with over a carriage service with the intention of causing physical or mental harm to the victim, including self harm, or of arousing apprehension or fear in the victim for his or her own safety or the safety of another person. Indictable Offence Page 20 of 40
STATEMENT Taken By: Constable Peter Wilson VP 46137 N ame: _____ ________ STATES:
7. On the 11th November 2020 at an unpublished time, Ms Marriott breached the IVO by communicating to me via a LinkedIn invitation. The also invitation contained a serious threat directed at me, warning that ‘you will pay the price’ if I don’t withdraw the Personal Safety Order against her. Ms Marriott threatens to make a claim to the Family Court and to Workcover. On the 9th of December 2020, Ms Marriott breached the IVO by committing a prohibited behaviour in harassing me, with Ms Marriott following through with her 11th November 2020 threat to make a claim to Workcover, if I did not request of the Magistrates Court for the IVO to be withdrawn. Ms Marriott subsequently and falsely claimed to Workcover that her mental health issues were due to her 2019 employment by Smart Buoy Co P/L. Specifically, my 3rd August 2019 repossession of the company Toyota Tundra, which was stolen by Ms Marriott from my Eagle Point home, sometime between 11pm Saturday 6th July 2019 and 6am Sunday 7th July 2019. Ms Marriott’s claim to Workcover was rejected as being due to her own serious misconduct, following an independent psychiatrist assessment and an independent investigation. Ms Marriott’s actions in making this false and retaliatory Workcover claim required me as the employer to perform more than three days of compiling the employer response and interviews, along with this false claim creating considerable stress, apprehension and a fear that her vindictive reprisal for my lawful dismissing of her employment, will never end unless the Court order is enforced.
Page of 21 40
Acting As A Proxy For My Estranged Husband In 2019 a repeat of these actions, and the stealing of my digital Real Estate and the closure of a personal bank account made me homeless and destitute. Centrelink refused my claim because I was unable to supply the company financial information as my email and phone numbers were compromised. Not one domestic violence service, Police, Registrar or Magistrate provided any support whatsoever. I relied only on the kindness of strangers and charity for food. It was over a year before Centrelink paid me— I had no money, no registered vehicle to attend to Court Hearings where, even though I had provided information pertaining to my circumstance and I was a protected person under FVIO K12030938 the Bairnsdale Magistrate placed an Interim Personal Safety Order against me. The senior Police lawyer and head of the family violence unit at Bairnsdale was in attendance at every Hearing. That was the beginning of the end - The sky fell in Help with Reporting Domestic Abuse To The Police I need help with reporting to the police for domestic abuse that I am suffering from now and over the past 10 years from my estranged husband. I need help to report to police the breaches of the intervention order that’s in place now. I need help in getting my factory my office and my assets returned to me. The intervention order should give need this protection. I need help with technology so I was that I cannot be located. My working life and my social life are highly dependent on technology and the Internet. I need my access to my resources returned to me so I can keep myself safe from COVID-19. I am The Managing Director of MY Own company. How is it when we have a family law act and the police code of practice clearly stating that I am subjected to family violence and that the police take the matter seriously? It does not say that if you are in business with your partner that he is exempt from the law. Yet that is how I am being treated. Fobbed off with that’s a civil matter. Yes, my partner and my husband have acted unlawfully in workplace law and corporate law. But it is in the area of domestic Page 22 of 40
violence but I am most placed at risk in my working life my well- being my mental health and my safety are compromised. I have the proof, I have the documents, I have photographs, I have witnesses. I need help I cannot do this on my own any longer. My partner locked me out of my accommodation and my workplace. He took over my work, my email and phone numbers. He lied to the police and the courts. I cannot get Centrelink payment because I’m prevented from accessing my own financial documents. I cannot get domestic violence support or emergency housing because I do not have a Centrelink benefit. I have been homeless for one year. When Corona lockdown happened I had nowhere to go, no public facilities, no cafes or libraries to go and work in. I did however have the luxury of a vehicle to sleep in. I have been surviving on the kindness of strangers the salvos Vinnies and Anglicare. Even though there is an IV0 in place the police Say it is a civil matter do not investigate I am homeless and destitute. July 2020 Lawyers have a duty, as officers of the Court, not to mislead the Court…. In complying with this duty, lawyers must, as early as practicable: • advise clients of ways of resolving the dispute without starting legal action • advise clients of their duty to make full and frank disclosure, and of the possible consequences of breaching that duty FEDERAL CIRCUIT A N D FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (FAMILY LAW) RULES 2021 - RULE 1.04 Overarching purpose(1) The overarching purpose of these Rules, as provided by section 67 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court Act, is to facilitate the just resolution of disputes according to law and as quickly, inexpensively and efficiently as possible. Note 1: These Rules must be interpreted and applied, and any power conferred or duty imposed by them must be exercised or carried out, in the way that best promotes the overarching purpose (see subsection 67(3) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court Act).
Page 23 of 40
(2) Parties to family law proceedings must conduct the proceeding (including negotiations for settlement of the dispute to which the proceeding relates) in a way that is consistent with the overarching purpose. (3) A party's lawyer must, in the conduct of a proceeding before the court (including negotiations for settlement) on the party's behalf: (a) take account of the duty imposed on the party referred to in subrule (2); and(b) assist the party to comply with the duty. Dear Mr Dean, CC Mr Bloetz Given you have stated in court, that you are confused by my documents and that your client accuses me of misappropriating thousands of dollars; hopefully this précis will help you to mediate and reassure your client that I have always acting ethically and honestly with company and family finances. The applicant has been led astray and his paranoia and delusions have been validated by bad advice from professionals and led him to manipulate other people to act against me. Professionals have acted with : 1. Malfeasance - Intentional conduct that is wrongful or unlawful 2. Nonfeasance - failure to act where there was a duty to act 3. Misfeasance - conduct that is lawful but inappropriate People who are not business minded often find financial matters challenging and intimidating. Your client, whose trade craft is ACTING, has never taken any interest in the family finances, paid a bill or contributed financially or even practically to our household or family life. I am the founder of the company, which phoenixed to avoid legal proceedings brought about by the debt that your client created in 2014/15. I alone had carried out the role of Managing Director. This is termed a shadow or deemed director with the same responsibilities and duties as an ASIC registered director. I presided over the
Page 24 of 40
company financials and manufacturing/production for over twenty years; for eight of those years the turnover was 3/4 million dollars. Your client did not appreciate that wages were $300,000 with overheads in the order of $300,000. Manufacturing is a challenging industry... ...The Applicant took no part or interest in my role and in later years, failed to carry out any more than the worst of the casual employees; in addition he sabotaged my business activities. After the disastrous outcome on the City of Ballarat rowing course debacle, your client never recovered his former 'working' life in the practical areas he excelled at. During January to June 2014 the company was paying wages to eight people for production of $500,000 of orders. Managing cash flow was challenging but on the 1st of July 2014, for the first time the Business Line Of Credit was paid off, the company had no debts and was owed $70,000 by the City Of Ballarat. We owned our factories in Lake Road, and my office in Victoria Place. ..After your client locked me out in 2014/15 (AND HAD Victoria Police REMOVE ME FROM OUR WORKPLACE) he employed people from his theatre group to do production and Simpson Personnel, being fully aware of his behaviour towards me, invoiced the applicant personally and not in the company name… ...Page 4 of 36 para 9.1 refers to the Partners Business Assets and Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement Jan 2016. This document explains in detail and in plain English the financial arrangements made whereby I undertook to pay the debts and liabilities of $500,000, created by your client in 2014/15 after he locked me out of my workplace, removed my authorised signature from the company bank accounts and prevented me from earning a living. He not only locked me out, but called police to have me removed from my workplace and the dwelling where our family life was conducted…
Page 25 of 40
...Heinz Law have fostered his misunderstandings and pandered to his delusions. If your client had abided by these two agreements he would have been financially secure for life. On October 29th 2019 when you Adrian, offered to mediate and undertook to send me documents as listed in your email, it was clear that you had no understanding of your clients situation and that you did nothing to assure your client that the loan approval was in his best interests...($300,000 APPROVED LOAN) ...The applicant has no pecuniary interest in the company Smart Buoy Co Pty Ltd or even to Buoyage Systems Australia Pty Ltd. Documentary evidence shows that your client has interfered in both company's and continues do do so. He has orchestrated a campaign to take control over my assets, company assets owned jointly with my partner, and our privately owned assets. Heinz Law have aided and abetted in this campaign by manipulating my partner to provide false information to police, The Magistrates Court, accountants, First Mortgage Investments, lawyers, business associates, and other entities both government and private. The Applicant has, since I was eight years old turned every one of my relationships against me. Seven years after I had moved to the other side of the state, separated myself financially and left him financially secure for life he has managed to totally destroy, my relationship with my partner, all my adult children, and sabotage my business activities and lifestyle. His actions have left me destitute. The Applicant has used Heinz Law and the Family Court (Victoria Police and The Magistrates Court) to hurt me emotionally, psychologically and economically. The Applicants Affidavits contain remarks that untrue and are hurtful, distressing and irrelevant to financial proceedings. The Applicants' instigation of the incident of 3rd August middle of the night taking of my work vehicle, when I was 600km's from home and the subsequent manipulation of the over 27 magistrates hearings have been cruel.
Page 26 of 40
The failure by Victoria Police to investigate and the errors made by the Magistrates Court together with the false information given to both organisations has denied me secure accommodation in a pandemic, leaving me isolated, frightened and destitute. Centrelink will not pay me because I cannot supply my financial information. I survive only on the kindness of strangers and charity. In the year (2015) that the Applicant locked me out of my work and company—I was employed at a bus company - income $28,206:00. Your clients income of $2000 came from the company - he didn't actually do any work. Heinz Law have acted in the latest Personal Safety Order proceedings, with a clause specifically precluding me from communicating through a lawyer, to my partner (former employee- dismissed for serious misconduct by email to Heinz Law) 2. 3. The Applicant has not provided a full and frank disclosure of his financial position. He has not complied with the Interim Order : a. Judicial Registrar Mathews 8th December 2021. no. 6 (c), (d) b. Judicial Registrar Dixon 15th February 2022 no. 4 c. Judicial Registrar Taylor - Heinz Law and The applicants' actions prevent me from complying with no. 2 and d. in The Court Notes B- caused the errors made by the magistrates court on 16th September 2019, 20th February 2020 and the 10th September 2020. e. Heinz Law caused the court to repeat the error identified by Victoria Police that led to the three arrests and charges of stalking and 98 breaches of the invalid PSO i. After the police application for the PSIO to be revoked Heinz law immediately applied for a third PSO thus ii. prolonging the matter, and giving further opportunity 1. for police to arrest me and 2. preventing access to my workplace, accommodation and 3. preventing me from earning a living. f. These actions against me have also meant that Centrelink rejected my claim. i. I do not have any money for transport, the company vehicle I was driving is no longer registered or roadworthy. ii. But for the kindness of strangers I would be sleeping rough. Page 27 of 40
TLS Payphone Locations
Page 28 of 40
Keeping Safe —A Bullet With Your Name On A Power to prevent Badluck
did contravene that order by Making a false claim to WorkCover after telling the protected person that she would do so the Personal Safety Intervention Order was not withdrawn causing stress, fear and apprehension to the Protected Person
Page 29 of 40
Lamarilli Leonardo MILA N —Stolen
Page 30 of 40
Fake Crime Stoppers - Bairnsdale Community Page
Page of 31 40
About the Author Maggie Marriott working in HER Bairnsdale Factory 2016 M aggie Marriott M anaging Director Smart Buoy Co Pty Ltd 21 Bosworth Rd Bairnsdale 3875 Victoria Australia In July 2019, conspirators stole my Online Infrastructure & company. These perpetrators continue disrupting me by deactivating my LinkedIn & Facebook accounts. I publish the evidence of this crime under a nom de plume NormaOlive Brown on Facebook. Technology has empowered my lifestyle ever since I built a website in 1999. The website, photography, and telephone enabled communication and enquiry from waterway authorities. Having a device for every part of the 24 hours allowed me to be a dedicated mother at home with a corporate facade.
“Managing the logistical requirements of remote area deliveries and installations across all Australian States enabled me to meet with
Page 32 of 40
customers onsite, give a high level of customer service, and inform product design around installation requirements.” “During installation, customer engagement onsite influenced product design, manufacture and production, and safety aspects required during installation. Managing logistics for remote areas and high-risk on water projects requires insight & thorough documentation.” "Maggie carried out interstate deliveries to remote locations & developed industry knowledge, towing a trailer to arrive onsite on the scheduled installation day. Her job management in the work parties developed customer relationships. Advising installation managers onsite at waterways, construction sites, & depots for waterway authorities gave Maggie industry knowledge, enabling management, logistics & documentation for high-risk on-water jobs.” "Maggie has knowledge of logistics, documentation, insurance & certification requirements for Waterway Authorities, Construction Companies and Hydro-Electric corporations." "As the company's managing director & founder, I understand the constraints of production, manufacturing, & logistics. Delivery & onsite installation advice enabled an end-to-end solution, giving me valuable insight into requirements and solutions for waterway safety. Technology underpins my work, allowing a rich, rewarding, fully integrated lifestyle.
Page 33 of 40
On Facebook as NormaOlive Brown and Dorothea Mason
Follow Me on YouTube Follow us on facebook
Follow us on instagram
Follow us on twitter
Catalogue Maggie Marriott Smart Buoy Co Pty Ltd
January 8, 2024 mandated by the magistrate and enforced by Victoria Police I am prevented from carrying out the fiduciary duties and the role and responsibilities of a company director. Maggie Marriott Smart Buoy Co Pty Ltd 21 Bosworth Rd Bairnsdale Victoria. I have managed so far to avoid too much damage to my psyche as a result of having my identity obliterated and the ongoing escalating abuse. However, I have experienced physical symptoms of fear when interacting with the police and the judiciary. In documenting the
DARVO, it has become clear to me that the administrative failures and lack of writing skills exhibited by police and the judiciary enable and embolden people suffering from a normative mental response to difficult situations. Pandering to delusional thinking encourages and exacerbates destructive and damaging behaviours. And the target of those behaviours is unable to comprehend or verbalise what the fuck just happened. Maggie Marriott. Managing Director Smart Buoy Co Pty Ltd
Page 34 of 40
Crime Stoppers Australia Bairnsdale Moaners and Groaners Community Forum Victoria Police are looking for assistance from the public to locate Margaret
(Maggie) Marriott, whom they would like to speak to regarding reports of stalking and repeated breaches of a Magistrates Court Order. Margaret is actively avoiding Police arrest and is known to change her location regularly. Police believe Margaret is currently staying in temporary accommodation in the Bairnsdale / East Gippsland area, but has also been known to frequent the Sale and Leongatha areas. If you know where Margaret may be staying, or the blue Toyota Prado 1QN6IJ she may be driving, please contact the Victoria Police non-emergency line on 131444, or Bairnsdale Police Station on 03 5150 2600, or Sale Police Station on 03 5142 2200. Alternatively contact CrimeStoppers on 1800 333 000. Reports to Police and CrimeStoppers can be anonymous. Please assist Victoria Police by sharing.
TLS Payphone Wed, 13 Dec at 1:25 pm NO ONE WLD FUCKU BAD BO BAD TEETH WARTS THIEF FKN LIAR AND FKN UGLY AND A DRUNK 0395281320 - NO REPLY only call back allowed
Page 35 of 40
Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online