The Buoy Company Destroyed by Magistrate and Police

i. After the police application for the PSIO to be revoked Heinz law immediately applied for a third PSO thus ii. prolonging the matter, and giving further opportunity 1. for police to arrest me and 2. preventing access to my workplace, accommodation and 3. preventing me from earning a living. f. These actions against me have also meant that Centrelink rejected my claim. i. I do not have any money for transport, the company vehicle I was driving is no longer registered or roadworthy. ii. But for the kindness of strangers I would be sleeping rough.

Charge 4 The accused at an unknown location in Victoria on Wednesday the 9th of December 2020 being a person against whom a Personal Safety intervention order was made pursuant to Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act, and having been served with a copy of such an order or had an explanation of the order given to her in

Charge 2 making a false claim to Workcover

Causing stress, fear and apprehension

accordance with section 40 (Interim Order) of the Act did contravene that order by Making a false claim to WorkCover after telling the protected person that she would do so the Personal Safety Intervention Order was not withdrawn… causing stress, fear and apprehension to the Protected Person

Page 27 of 48

Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online