that you are attending Court on 22 March 2022 to answer numerous breaches of this order." https://online.flippingbook.com/view/634688045/ 07 FB Group The Court Must N ot Make A Final Order N ormaOlive BrownFailure to Protect - Australia (exposing Family Court & related systems) Shared with Private group (4) Despite subsection (1), the court must not make a final order if satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the respondent engaged in the prohibited behaviour or stalking without malice — (a) in the normal course of a lawful business, trade, profession or enterprise State Library Windows on Collections Operation Veteran Assist https://online.flippingbook.com/link/950713/ PERSONAL SAFETY INTERVENTION ORDERS ACT 2010 - SECT 61 Power of court to make final order (1) The court may make a final order if the court is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that— (a) the respondent has— (i) committed prohibited behaviour against the a ff ected person and— (A) is likely to continue to do so or do so again; and (B) the respondent's prohibited behaviour would cause a reasonable person to fear for his or her safety; or (ii) stalked the a ff ected person and is likely to continue to do so or do so again; and (b) the respondent and the a ff ected person are not family members; and (c) it is appropriate in all the circumstances of the case to make a final order. (4) Despite subsection (1), the court must not make a final order if satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the respondent engaged in the prohibited behaviour or stalking without malice — (a) i n the normal course of a lawful business, trade, profession or enterprise (including that of any body or person whose business, or whose principal business, is the publication, or arranging for the publication, of news or current a ff airs material); or Charge 64 of 67 recognised the Catamaran AS HIS OW N ! Surveillance and Stalking Charge 64. On the 10th of January 2024 at 9:23am, the accused posted on a Facebook account in the name of Norma Olive Brown.' The post was two images of the victims catamaran which he had listed for sale on Facebook market place on his personal account. The victim observed the post from the accused and recognised the catamaran boat to be his own and felt the accused was keeping him under surveillance. *Contravene by publishing on the internet material about the protected person & stalking.
08 FB Group Post Separation Abuse Teachers Pet NormaOlive Brown Failure to Protect - Australia (exposing Family Court & related systems) Shared with Private group
Post Separation Abuse utilising Family Court, Magistrates Court and Victoria Police. He paid over $100,000 to an old established law firm to destroy me. This law firm with full knowledge of my new relationship and that I am the managing director of the company I founded in 2000 has also billed my now estranged partner and my company an expected $40-50,000 to put in place personal safety orders that made it a criminal o ff ence for me to go to my accommodation and workplace.
Maritime Data Buoys & Barriers Co
Page 28 of 64
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator