TheApplicant has, since I was eight years old turned every one of my relationships against me. Seven years after I had moved to the other side of the state, separated myself financially and left him financially secure for life he has managed to totally destroy, my relationship with my partner, all my adult children, and sabotage my business activities and lifestyle. His actions have left me destitute. The Applicant has used Heinz Law and the Family Court (Victoria Police and The Magistrates Court) to hurt me emotionally, psychologically and economically. The Applicants Affidavits contain remarks that untrue and are hurtful, distressing and irrelevant to financial proceedings. The Applicants' instigation of the incident of 3rd August middle of the night taking of my work vehicle, when I was 600km's from home and the subsequent manipulation of the over 27 magistrates hearings have been cruel. The failure by Victoria Police to investigate and the errors made by the Magistrates Court together with the false information given to both organisations has denied me secure accommodation in a pandemic, leaving me isolated, frightened and destitute. Centrelink will not pay me because I cannot supply my financial information. I survive only on the kindness of strangers and charity. In the year (2015) that the Applicant locked me out of my work and company—I was employed at a bus company— income $28,206:00. Your clients income of $2000 came from the company - he didn't actually do any work. Heinz Law have acted in the latest Personal Safety Order proceedings, with a clause specifically precluding me from communicating through a lawyer, to my partner (former employee— dismissed for serious misconduct by email to Heinz Law) 2. 3. The Applicant has not provided a full and frank disclosure of his financial position. He has not complied with the Interim Order : a. Judicial Registrar Mathews 8th December 2021. no. 6 (c), (d) b. Judicial Registrar Dixon 15th February 2022 no. 4 c. Judicial Registrar Taylor - Heinz Law and The Applicants' actions prevent me from complying with no. 2 and d. in The Court Notes B- caused the errors made by the magistrates court on 16th September 2019, 20th February 2020 and the 10th September 2020. e. Heinz Law caused the court to repeat the error identified by Victoria Police that led to the three arrests and charges of stalking and 98 breaches of the invalid PSO i. After the police application for the PSIO to be revoked Heinz law immediately applied for a third PSO thus ii. prolonging the matter, and giving further opportunity 1. for police to arrest me and 2. preventing access to my workplace, accommodation and 3. preventing me from earning a living. f. These actions against me have also meant that Centrelink rejected my claim. i. I do not have any money for transport, the company vehicle I was driving is no longer registered or roadworthy. ii. But for the kindness of strangers I would be sleeping rough.
Maritime Data Buoys & Barriers Co
Page 47 of 64
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator