Maggie Marriott Smart Buoy Co Managing Director Ms Marriott’s claim to Workcover was rejected as being due to her own serious misconduct, following an independent psychiatrist assessment and an independent investigation. Ms Marriott’s actions in making this false and retaliatory Workcover claim, required me as the employer to perform more than three days of compiling the employer response and interviews, along with this false claim creating considerable stress, apprehension and a fear that her vindictive reprisals for my lawful dismissing of her employment, will never end unless the Court order is enforced.
Six Police Informants and Briefs before the court
01 WILSON VP46137 M10234037 ESLB210178 02 MANSON VP37268 M10703442 ESLB210155 03 VP12345 M10870447 EWNUNI21H911978793 pt 1 and 2 04 SKEELS VP43099 M11587875 ESLB210126 05 KING VP47283 N10186670 21B911924660 06 ABRAHAM VP45912 N10197401 ESLB211000
PSIO Breaches from the twelve statements 1. On the 21st December 2020 at an unknown time, Ms Marriott breached the IVO by publishing online about me to LinkedIn. Ms Marriott published excerpts of a text message I sent to a mutual Chinese – Australian friend Juan Wang, in September 2019. Juan and her husband Tobias, had expressed to me their concerns about Ms Marriott’s behaviour. My text advised Juan to speak to Ms Marriott’s Timothy MARRIOTT. Timothy is also a good friend of Juan and Toby and is fluent in Mandarin, plus willing to explain to Juan the Marriott family’s concerns about his mothers mental health. 2.
Updated 10 October 2025
Page 50 of 77
Wednesday 15 May 2024
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online