Development Standards | Wireless Communication Facilities
conditional use permit pursuant to Table A in SDC 21.06.060G. shall be processed pursuant to the conditional use permit process under this subsection 2.b. A conditional use permit may be granted by the director if the applicant demonstrates the following: a) Wireless use locations pursuant to subsection 2.a. of this section and SDC 21.06.060G., Table A, will not meet network deployment objectives; and b) Collocation on a nearby facility is infeasible, unavailable, and/or will not meet network deployment objectives. ii. Applicants shall submit technical analysis to support the conditional use permit request. iii. A conditional use permit may also be used to allow a deviation from the dimensional standards required by this chapter or the Wireless Facility Design Standards, pursuant to the following criteria: a) The applicant can demonstrate through technical analysis, subject to review by City consultant, that there is no other location that is technically feasible or available that would meet the dimensional requirements; or
c) Demonstrate that the WCF can still meet all other design elements of this chapter and/or the Wireless Facilities Design Standards and public works standards if on public right-of-way. iv. Further, macro cell facilities that cannot be sited pursuant to subsection 2.a. of this section must meet one of the following infeasibility criteria, to the extent applicable: a) The network provider must provide the designated official with documentation that establishes that it contacted the owner of each existing wireless facility that currently houses a macro cell facility located within 1,000 feet of the proposed location and that owner has denied the network provider’s request to collocate. If the request was granted but the network provider contends it still cannot locate at that location for other reasons, the network provider must provide the designated official with a detailed explanation of why the collocation is not technically feasible or otherwise not possible, and is subject to third-party review. b) The network provider must provide the designated official with documentation that establishes that it considered locations within those nonresidential zones located within 1,000 feet of the proposed location. This documentation must be completed and certified by a designated employee or contractor outlining the reasons which must be technical or permissive in nature why such locations within
b) The applicant can demonstrate through technical analysis, subject to review by City
consultant, the dimensional requirements of the structure does not allow the WCF to function; and
374 | Title 21: Sammamish Development Code
Effective | January 1, 2022
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator