What we mean by The Value Gap
Fully charged vs low power.
Think of a transformation programme as a battery. The investment case defines its full charge, in effect, the revenue growth, cost reduction or capability uplift that the organisation is paying for. Delivery gets the battery built and connected. But building the battery is not the same as charging it. Too many transformations reach go- live with the programme live, the org chart redrawn and the new operating model documented but only partially charged. Adoption is patchy. Leaders talk about the change but don’t always visibly live it. Middle managers, still measured on old KPIs, quietly protect old ways of working. The capability to sustain the new model was never built. Within months, benefits tracking becomes an awkward, deprioritised task that nobody owns. The result: transformation delivered, value only partially realised. The Value Gap is the difference between the value promised in the business case and the value actually banked or realised. You’re not fully charged.
This gap can’t be seen on a programme dashboard, because programme dashboards measure delivery: scope, schedule, budget and risk. They were never designed to measure value realisation, which requires tracking behaviour, adoption and benefits long after the programme team has disbanded. Because it isn’t measured, it isn’t managed. It quietly leaks away throughout the transformation, one decision at a time, one behaviour at a time. Our experience across complex transformation programmes tells us that value rarely disappears because of technology. Instead, it leaks through predictable areas. Understanding them is the first step to closing the gap.
Every executive has lived this moment...
The business case promised £100m in benefits – greater productivity, lower operating costs, faster decisions, better customer outcomes. Whilst the programme absorbed the usual scars along the way – scope changes, slipped milestones, a business case revisited more than once – it got there: the programme went live, the technology was implemented, the new operating model was stood up, the steering committee moved on. 18-months later, when someone finally asks how much of that £100m was actually realised, the honest answer is: nobody really knows. This is not, in most cases, a failure of programme delivery. Even accounting for the usual turbulence, most large transformations do eventually reach go-live in a form the business recognises and accepts. The failure lies elsewhere – in the gap between what was delivered and what was actually put to work inside the organisation. It’s the proportion of transformation value that never reaches the organisation. We call this The Value Gap.
Delivering the programme isn’t the same as delivering the outcome
This paper sets out what The Value Gap is, why it opens up in even well-run transformations, and the five places where value most commonly leaks away before it ever reaches the P&L.
Programme delivered
CHECK-CIRCLE
👍
Value realised
👎
2
3
real change • real difference
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs