reinforces the FTC’s power to shape mergers and acquisitions, even in a more deregulatory political environment. n
share appears manageable, specific regional overlaps can lead to antitrust violations if they substantially reduce consumer choice or facilitate price increases. The outcome of this case
than under previous leadership, especially during the tenure of former Chair Lina Khan, this intervention suggests the agency is still willing to act when consumer pricing and competitive markets are at stake. In this case, the fuel retail sector’s importance and visibility appear to have triggered a more cautious regulatory approach. The fuel and convenience store industry has seen rapid consolidation over the past decade, as major players like ACT have sought to expand their geographic footprints through acquisitions. These moves often promise improved efficiency and streamlined operations, but they also raise concerns about reduced competition, particularly in smaller and mid-sized markets where only a few firms operate. By blocking ACT from acquiring certain Giant Eagle locations in overlapping markets, the FTC is seeking to prevent monopolistic control and preserve pricing discipline among retailers. The FTC’s decision could have ripple effects throughout the industry. It underscores the importance of evaluating not just national market impacts, but also localized competitive dynamics. Even in transactions where a company’s overall market
NOZZLE & WRENCH I JULY 2025 17
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online