2019 SAE Corporate Learning Aero Resource Guide - P18295967

ENGINEERING TOOLS AND METHODS

• Recognize the gaps, issues, and challenges of implementing a math-based PDP Who Should Attend This course is valuable for designers, engineers, and managers who are considering implementation of a math-based product development process. Prerequisites In order to understand the course content, students should have a basic understanding of Y14.5 Dimensioning and Toler- ancing practices. • Problems with current PDPs • What a math-based PDP is • The benefits of math-based PDPs • The role of standards in implementing math-based PDPs General Information on the ASME Y14.41 Standard • The history of the Y14.41 standard • Basic information about Y14.41 • Y14.41 terms The Data Set Concept • The data set concept explained • Two methods in the standard for creating product definition data sets Common Requirements for Data Sets • Data set and design model requirements that apply to both the annotated model data set and drawing data set • Display management requirements • Reasons for model value query • Requirements for resolved, basic, and size dimensions Requirements for the Drawing Data Set Method • The data set requirements that apply to the drawing data set method • General method requirements for drawing data set method • The requirements for work coordinate systems in orthographic and axonometric views • The requirements for specifying section views, dimensions in axonometric views, datums, and geometric tolerances Requirements for the Annotated Model Method • The data requirements that apply to annotated model data sets • The design model requirements for the annotated model method • The requirements for views, annotation, query, and notes on annotated models Topical Outline The Product Development Process • The characteristics of current PDPs

Tolerancing Using the Annotated Model Method • The requirements for plus-minus tolerances • The requirements for datum applications • The requirements for displaying geometric tolerances Gaps, Issues, and Challenges of Implementing a Math-Based Development Process • The benefits of the Y14.41 standard • The major questions that companies need to answer to implement a math-based development process • The gaps and issues when trying to achieve a math-based product development process

Course summary

Instructor: Fee: $835

ASME GDTP Senior Certified Trainer

.7 CEUs

URL:

sae.org/learn/content/et2501/

Tolerance Stack-up Fundamentals 6 Hours | Web Seminar or On Demand Course I.D.# C0842 or I.D.# PD330842ON

Analysis of tolerance stacks varies widely. This web seminar introduces the basic tools to create a common methodology for tolerance stack-ups, and ensure seamless documentation. Participants will create 1-D tolerance stacks for parts and assemblies that use geometric dimensioning and tolerancing using a tolerance stack spreadsheet. This simple, manual spreadsheet method produces an easily interpreted and checked documentation trail, and is easily adaptable to common electronic spreadsheet programs. Multiple examples will be provided to assist engineers in applying tolerance stack-up fundamentals to Y14.5 issues. Learning Objectives By connecting with this web seminar, you will be able to: • Perform and develop a tolerance stack-up analysis • Correctly enter geometric feature control frame data into a tolerance stack • Apply a common step-by-step methodology to tolerance stack analysis Who Should Attend Engineers familiar with concepts and practices contained within Y14.5 and who are looking for a fundamental step-by-step process for getting geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) into a tolerance stack will benefit from this course. A basic under- standing of GD&T symbols and concepts is required.

53

3 ways to get a no-obligation price quote to deliver a course to your company: Call SAE Corporate Learning at +1.724.772.8529  |  Fill out the online quote request at sae.org/corplearning  |  Email us at Corplearn@sae.org

Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker