That’s a big issue. It also opens the possibility that many other states would adopt the same kind of legislation, so it’s extremely important that the very best clear presentation of all of the dangers and constitutional prohibitions that this law entails be seriously looked at by a serious judge. Our judge is a very serious person. He's looked at it in great detail. We’re hoping that he’ll rule that the children can go to school while we have this fight. If he doesn’t, then we’ll look at our options. We will continue to have the battle over vaccination, and we’ll figure out something that we can think about with the students who are not allowed in school at that point. Thanks, Jim, and I hope that the judge takes into consideration that if these vaccinations that are forced upon us actually worked, the other children are no threat if they’re in school with them. Either way, I appreciate and I want to support the work that you’re doing on this, and all that you’ve done for us in the past as well. We also have Robert Moxley, and he has actually practiced inside the National Childhood Vaccine injury compensation program since its inception back in 1988. For those of you that don’t realize, that is a secret court in this country. Why do we need secrecy for something that works? His extensive vaccine practice has led to a civil rights practice as well. He represents parents and families, trying to vindicate them based on their religious and conscientious objection to the mandatory vaccination. Mr. Moxley has actually obtained a reversal in the Federal Circuit Court of the denial of compensation to a vaccine injured child in a case that went to the United States Supreme Court. He has such a different insight than anyone else we could possibly bring on to this show to share with our audience what actually happens with this whole vaccination issue. Robert thanks for being with us today, and I appreciate what you do as well. I just want to see what you can offer our audience based on your experience. Thank you for having me. I have been involved in this, and as a matter of personal thrust. I got into this business by accident when in 1988, when I was associated with a law firm here in Cheyenne, Wyoming that was a products liability law firm, and we had a DTP vaccine case in the office. When we were about to file a products liability suit, the vaccine act was passed, which made it look like a great thing. It was touted as a no fault compensation program. It was touted as being quick, easy, generous, and the actual thrust of the act when it was first passed was that they would compensate apparent vaccine injuries generously in order to give people confidence in the notion that they could submit their children to vaccinations. Actually the act when it was first passed contemplated that you would file a vaccine compensation petition in your own local US District Court, and that your US District Court would appoint a special master to see whether or not a particular condition would fit, first of all on what was called the vaccine injury table. There was a large
Dr. Hoffman:
Robert Moxley:
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online