Smog, Soot, and Stubble How Bountiful Beards Became Victorian Air Purifiers
Step aside, antibiotics! In the smog-choked streets of 1850s London, where chimney smoke clung to every surface and a “fog” could linger for months, doctors championed a fuzzy solution. The prescription? Grow a beard. Not just any beard, but big, bushy, chest-brushing beards that could rival a lion’s mane. Their advice made it seem like thick, woolly beards were a frontline defense against disease. As London’s population surged past the one million mark in the mid-1800s, so did its coal consumption. Residents warmed their homes and powered the city with coal, releasing dense plumes of smoke that clung to the damp air. These weren’t your average winter mists. In 1873, one thick smog event blanketed the city, contributing to hundreds of bronchitis-related deaths. Another hung around for four months in 1879, plunging London into darkness.
Victorian physicians, caught between outdated theories and the dawn of germ science, believed thick beards could filter the noxious air swirling through the city. With coal smoke saturating the sky and mysterious illnesses lurking in every cough, they saw the beard as
a barrier and a natural air purifier, trapping invisible enemies before they reached the throat or lungs. Public speakers were even told their beards would soothe strained vocal cords! Men were reassured that their whiskers could keep sore throats at bay. noble picture of the beard. According to dermatologists and ecologists, those bodacious beards trap bacteria, food particles, and even play host to tiny squatters (aka ectoparasites). What the Victorians hailed as a filter functioned more like a germ motel! But here’s the ironic twist in this follicular fairy tale. Modern research paints a less So, while the beard boom of the 1800s was well-intentioned, it might be best remembered as a moment when style, “science,” and smog collided and the beard won (if only temporarily).
When It’s Your Word Against Theirs
Why Witnesses Matter in Accident Cases
Real-life accidents don’t play out like a movie scene. There’s no dramatic music, no instant replay, and no one’s standing by with a notebook writing everything down. That’s a problem because when it comes to proving what happened, especially in personal injury cases, the difference between winning and losing can come down to one thing: a witness. I’ve had cases where a single person stepping forward changed everything. I once went to a witness’s house 80 times trying to catch him. Not exaggerating. I knew we might lose the case if I didn’t catch him. When I finally got him to talk, and his story aligned perfectly with our client’s. It turned the tide. The truth is that most cases don’t have enough witnesses. People see something, but they keep driving, or they assume someone else will say something. Meanwhile, the injured person is left with nothing but their own words, trying to prove they didn’t cause the crash.
That’s tough, especially in parking lot accidents or lane changes where fault isn’t obvious.
We’re lucky video sometimes steps in to fill the gap. It might be a camera on someone’s doorbell or a phone recording from across the street. Even grainy footage can make a difference, but it works best when paired with a human account. I’ve seen it firsthand. In one case, a police trooper hit a client’s car right in front of their home. The cruiser caused serious damage, but it was the client’s word against the officer’s — until a neighbor’s video turned up. The video wasn’t perfect, but a witness backed it up, and that combination sealed the deal. So, if you see something, then say something. Don’t assume someone else will. Put yourself in that injured person’s shoes. Wouldn’t you want someone to step up for you? When it comes down to it, your voice might be what helps make things right.
4 2
Published by Newsletter Pro • newsletterpro.com
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator