Michael Lissack
inauthentic compared to real patient experiences, even when technically “well-written.” Context Limitations : Current AI systems lack full understanding of organizational context and history, creating risk of narratives that sound plausible but violate important unwritten norms or values. Technology company IBM discovered this when an AI-generated company history omitted crucial culture-shaping events that weren’t prominent in the training data but were essential to employee identity. Ethical Responsibility : The ease of generating AI narratives raises questions about appropriate transparency and representation. When gov- ernment agency Service NSW used AI to help draft citizen success stories, they developed explicit disclosure protocols to ensure subjects under- stood how their experiences were being shaped through technological assistance. Narrative Homogenization : Widespread adoption of similar AI tools risks creating narrative uniformity across organizations, diminish- ing distinctive voice and authentic character. Professional services firm Deloitte addresses this by using AI for initial narrative development but requiring human refinement focused specifically on incorporating unique cultural voice and perspective. Human Narrative Capability Atrophy : Overreliance on AI for narrative tasks risks diminishing the organization’s human storytelling capabilities over time. Educational technology company Coursera main- tains dedicated narrative development sessions where teams craft stories without technological assistance to preserve these fundamental human capabilities. Creating Effective Human-AI Narrative Partnerships The most sophisticated organizations are developing approaches that combine AI capabilities with human narrative intelligence, creating part- nerships more powerful than either alone:
200
Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease