Estimated Enrollment of Existing and Proposed Residential Development
APPENDIX E - Table 14
First Year/ Year Built
Dec-25
# Units by Type
% Affordable Statistics
Total Estimated NPS Students
Total # Added to Projections
Actual to Estimated Difference
Actual Avg # NPS Students
Fully Phased In
Avg unit SGR (NPS)
Development Name
Total
Studio- M
Avg # BRs
1BR-M 2BR-M 3BR-M St-A 1BR-A 2BR-A 3BR-A
Project Status
Comprehensive Permit
Est.
78 Crafts Street
55
2027 2032
# Units
36 106 77 26
9 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 8 0 2 1 1 0 1 9 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 19
7
307
# Students Projected Method 1 # Students Projected Method 2 # Students Projected Method 3 Less: Private School (12%) Total impact on districted schools Total # Students - Average of 3 Methods
0 7 2 3 0 3
0
17 21
0 5 1 2 0 2
19 20
77 60 53 62 -7 55
21 15
5 5
4 8
1 1 7
0.17920% 1.3855
-
-
4 8
31
21 10
10 -1
-1
-3 18
-1
-1
7
9
9
6
Est.
Northland (Needham Street)
136
2027 2032
Special Permit
# Units
68 303 272 34 12 57 48
6
800
# Students Projected Method 1 # Students Projected Method 2 # Students Projected Method 3 Less: Private School (12%) Total impact on districted schools Total # Students - Average of 3 Methods
0
0
58 27
0
49 17 151
14 61 55
7
12 10
1 1 6
162 156 156 -20 136
0.17015% 1.40
136
-
-
4 6
10 112 6 24 75 13
2 5
20 26 -3 23
-1
-3
-9
-2
-1
-1
5
21 66 11
4
5
Comprehensive Permit
Est.
Northland Charlemont
91
2027 2032
# Units
25 93 132 27
31 44 10 370
# Students Projected Method 1 # Students Projected Method 2 # Students Projected Method 3 Less: Private School (12%) Total impact on districted schools Total # Students - Average of 3 Methods
0 6 2 3 0 3 0 7 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
28 22
0 7 1 3 0 3
45 28 123
21 30
6 6
10 21
2 2
84 99
0.246
25% 1.5991
-
-
4 8
62
40 11
25 11 102
-1
-5
-1
-3
-1
-11 91
7
35 10
22 10
Est.
Riverside Station
135
2027 2032
Special Permit
# Units
32 305 234 31
76 58
8
753
# Students Projected Method 1 # Students Projected Method 2 # Students Projected Method 3 Less: Private School (12%) Total impact on districted schools Total # Students - Average of 3 Methods
0
50 25
0
59 22 156
64 49 11 99
6 6
16 12
2 1 8
158 148 153 -18 135
0.17920% 1.44
135
-
-
3 6
25 32 -4 28
25 66 12
-3
-8
-1
-1
-1
22 58 11
5
7
Est.
1314 Washington Street
12
2027 2032
Special Permit
# Units
17 19
5 4 1 1 2 0 2
4 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 1
4 4 1 2 2 0 2
1 3 0 0 1 0 1
50 15 12 14 13 -1 12
# Students Projected Method 1 # Students Projected Method 2 # Students Projected Method 3 Less: Private School (12%) Total impact on districted schools Total # Students - Average of 3 Methods
0 4 1 2 0 2 0 9 1 3 0 3
4 5
0.24018% 1.70
12
-
-
10
6
-1
5
Comprehensive Permit
Est.
528 Boylston Street
73
2028 2033
# Units
28 68 42
22 16 184 22 45 116
# Students Projected Method 1 # Students Projected Method 2 # Students Projected Method 3
15 34 21 13 42 12 26 20
7
5 4
57 73 82 -9 73
0.39725% 2.1273
-
-
14
Total # Students - Average of 3 Methods Less: Private School (12%) Total impact on districted schools ~Building is omitted from calculations in Method 2 due to low actual SGR.
14 18
-3
-2
-2
-2
23 18
12 16
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator