Mrpushpanjali Padhy vs Indian Overseas Bank on 30 March, 20…

Mrpushpanjali Padhy vs Indian Overseas Bank on 30 March, 2016

Central Information Commission Mrpushpanjali Padhy vs Indian Overseas Bank on 30 March, 2016

Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000235 Right to Information Act−2005−Under Section (19)

Date of hearing : 30th March 2016

Date of decision : 30th March 2016

Name of the Appellant : Smt. Puspanjali Padhy,

W/o. Shri Ravindra Nath Padhy, At −Bank Colony 6th Lane, Opposite, All India Radio & Doordarsan Station, PO−Berhampur, Distt−Ganjam, Odisha− 760001

Name of the Public : Central Public Information Officer, Authority/Respondent Indian Overseas Bank,

Central Office: P. B. No.− 3765, 763, Anna Salai, Chennai− 600002 RTI Application filed on : 06 / 05 / 20 1 4 CP IO r e p l i e d on : 07 / 06 / 20 1 4 F i r s t App e a l f i l e d on : 07 / 07 / 20 1 4 First Appellate Authority order on : 26/09/2014 2nd Appeal received on : 09/01/2015 The Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Ganjam along with Advocate J. P. Chotray.

On behalf of the Respondents, Shri P. Madhavan, CPIO was present at the NIC Studio, Chennai.

CIC/SH/A/2015/000235 Information Commissioner : Shri Sharat Sabharwal

This matter, pertaining to an RTI application filed by the Appellant, seeking information on four points regarding the status report of action taken by CM, Berhampur on her complaint dated 3.12.2012 and related issues, came up today. The CPIO cited Section 16 and 25 of The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. He stated that instead of securing the reports / details of the enquiry in accordance with the provisions of the above Act (as per Section

13), it was not appropriate for the Appellant to circumvent such provisions and seek the information under the RTI Act. The CPIO denied the information under Section 8 (1) (b),

Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/96062499/

1

Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs