Marist Undergraduate Philosophy Journal Vol VI 2023

Diotima: The Marist Undergraduate Philosophy Journal

because they have experienced something funny. It is much more difficult to know

humor by reasoning through a joke, convincing oneself that it is funny. Humor

results in a physical response such as laughter or a smile, or even mental

amusement. In any case, there is a highly discernable experience associated with

encountering humor —like Hobbes said, it “is always joy.” 16 Making note of this

allows us to understand the role of our own mental states in instantiating humor.

The factor that I believe is missing from the definition of humor is one I have

named receptivity; that is, the ability and will of a person to determine or accept a

situation to be a benign violation. This idea aligns well with our previous

experiences, in that anyone can fathom a situation where two people experience the

same benign violation, yet one finds it humorous and the other does not. Receptivity

may be characterized in three ways: by a person’s taste, mood, or attention level.

Taste refers more to a person’s ability to be receptive to a certain benign violation.

This, too, grounds out well: one can conceive of the notion that some people may be

more sensitive to irony than others, delight in sarcasm more than others, appreciate

clever puns more than others, or think goofy-looking motions or noises downright

hilarious more than others. Mood and attention level are variable elements that can

impact ability and will, though I would argue, influence will more so. Consider the

mood of the person in a drunken state, who may find any situation they are in

exceptionally funny; or the attention level of the student who is zoned in on their

homework and unreactive to their humorous friends around them, but upon taking

a break, engages immediately with their jokes. We can also imagine situations that

are indiscernible matters of taste, mood, or will, and are instead a combination of

any of the three. Sometimes the slightest thing can erupt a room in laughter; other

times something of that same magnitude evokes a mere chuckle, if any reaction at

all, and one can have no distinct explanation why. One can understand this same

concept when referencing the variation in our own senses of humor; there may be

16 Hobbes, The Elements of Law, 41.

Volume VI (2023)

9

Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker