Marist Undergraduate Philosophy Journal Vol VI 2023

Diotima: The Marist Undergraduate Philosophy Journal

criticizing yourself for deliberating so badly.

Conclusion

To conclude, I want to suggest that the distinction between consequentialist and

deontological emotions is important in two ways: first, by strengthening and

enriching our understanding of the nature of emotions; and second, by raising

some important new questions about emotions in general. First, this distinction

between consequentialist and deontological emotions deepens our understanding

of the nature of emotions. Recall that consequentialist emotions focus on the

outcome, whereas deontological emotions focus on the causal pathways that bring

about the outcome. Again, this is not a normative ethical claim. Rather, it is a

claim about the essential nature of emotions in terms of what their focus is. We

have seen that regret focuses on a bad outcome, not bad deliberation. This led us

to identify a broader pattern between two different types of emotions:

consequentialist emotions like regret and gladness that focus on outcomes and

deontological emotions like self-reproach and self-pride that focus on causal

pathways. This suggests that there is a feature of emotions more broadly that has

been unappreciated in the existing literature. Second, this distinction between

consequentialist and deontological emotions also raises some interesting questions

about the nature of emotions in general. For example, what is the relationship

between consequentialist and deontological emotions? Do they play distinct roles

in our emotional lives? Should we care about one category more than the other?

And to take a concrete example, what should we think about a central emotion like

love? Is love a consequentialist or deontological emotion, and how does the answer

impact our understanding of love? All these questions seem important for

achieving a fuller and richer understanding of the nature of emotions and their

roles in our lives. While these questions are obviously outside this paper's scope,

raising them will hopefully promote further investigation.

Volume VI (2023)

49

Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker