Populo - Volume 1, Issue 2

as before their coma, it would be hard to argue them a different person due to

their break in consciousness.

This argument causes me to question how Locke would explain a person

who has been medically diagnosed as ‘brain-dead’. If there is a body, alive and

breathing in a hospital bed, with no consciousness, thoughts or memories, surely

an application of Locke’s theory would mean this is not the same person as

before they were brain dead. This presents me with many unanswered questions

regarding what their identity becomes and whether Locke would even consider

them a person anymore. To conclude that this body is not the same person as

they were before they became brain dead seems immoral and insensitive to me,

not to mention upsetting for family members and loved ones and quite frankly

hard to believe. When referring to this definition, many moral questions arise in

real life scenarios and medical situations such as how a doctor gains permission

to treat someone with no memories. If this person cannot have an identity, then

next of kin cannot give permission for treatment as they, surely, they cannot

prove to be the next of kin. In fact, according to Locke’s definition, this patient

would now be a man, but not a person. Furthermore, Locke’s argument raises

moral questions of accountability. Locke argues strongly in favour of

accountability, however, if the victim of a crime is asleep or brain-dead and

therefore of a different (or lacking) consciousness and identity, how can their

awake self hold someone accountable in a criminal case if not the defendant?

Overall, I find undeniable strength in the argument that a person’s identity

can be found in the persistence of their memories and awareness of their

continued existence through said memories. It is certainly a logical way of

concluding that a person is the same person they have always been as no one

else will have these memories or persistent experience of their existence.

However, I believe that Locke’s argument has a major flaw in its failure to explain

99

Made with FlippingBook HTML5