11010323 - Level I Zoom

8/10/22

Differences Between Tribal-State Compacts

■ Authorized Class III Games – An Arizona Compact authorizes Gaming Devices, Keno, lottery, off-track pari-mutual wagering, pari-mutual wagering on horse racing and dog racing. – A Kansas compact states that: “The Tribe may not conduct pari-mutual wagering, off track betting, sports betting, club keno or state-wide lottery gaming.” – Covered games under the Oklahoma Model Tribal-State Compact include electronic bonanza-style bingo games, electronic amusement games, and electronic instant bingo games, but excludes dice games.

17

Differences Between Tribal-State Compacts

■ State Regulation – Some compacts provide for the State to be heavily involved in regulatory issues such as licensure. Arizona compacts require state certification of certain gaming licenses – Others adopt a more “hands-off” approach and defer almost entirely to the tribal gaming regulatory agency – And others, such as the Oklahoma Model Tribal-State Compact, strike a middle- ground approach

18

9

Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs