The Historian 2015

The practical effects of the Magna Carta

would only come later, in the reign of John’s

son Henry III. In 1216, precariously facing

opposition from both the rebel barons and

Philip Augustus’ son Prince Louis, Henry

III’s government, in an attempt to win over

the barons, issued another version of the

Magna Carta, which, although it maintained

the general message of the previous

incarnation, had removed the radical clause

setting up the council of barons. It was

reissued again in 1217, with some additional

clauses to protect the barons’ rights, and to

reduce somewhat the King’s ability to levy

taxes. The Magna Carta was reissued once

The 1225 Magna Carta

more in 1225, in return for baronial consent

to taxation for the fight against Louis, now

King Louis VIII, which, by including explicit statements that it was of the King’s

own free will, also eliminated the objection that since the King had been forced

to consent to the document; he need not abide by it. It was not until 1297 under

Edward I that the version remaining in statute today was issued, essentially a

reissuing of the 1225 charter, in return for a new tax.

As is apparent, the 1215 Magna Carta, which is glorified by so many, whilst

potent in the ideas it espoused, was a failure in practice, and it was not until the

reigns of Henry III and Edward I that it would have any lasting influence. Nor

was the charter an outstanding triumph of the values of liberty and democracy,

but rather was a watered-down version, issued only because the English King

wished to raise taxation, or placate the barons. Nonetheless, the Magna Carta

13

Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker