ESTRO 2026 - Abstract Book PART I

S1447

Interdisciplinary - Other

ESTRO 2026

unified evaluative program. Demographic data were collected for all participants (patient/staff). Technologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists well-being was measured using the validated WRQoL-1 questionnaire, which assesses overall WRQoL as well as six subdomains. Participants were surveyed one month before, one month after, and six months after installation. Pre-planned analysis included the comparison of user staff with non-user of the MR-LINAC. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction data for all treated individuals, measured using the EORTC PATSat-C33 and PATSat-7 instruments longitudinally from time of initial consult (baseline) and up to 10 years following the end of treatment, were systematically collected. Results: Overall, QoL perceptions among staff (n=43) were remarkably stable. Profession was the most consistent factor shaping results in all domains. Overall WRQoL showed that physicists generally reported the highest levels of satisfaction and well-being (3.8, SD 0.2), technologists the lowest (3.4, SD 0.5), and radiation oncologists fell in between (3.7, SD 0.5). This stratification remained stable over six months. User status introduced only modest, subdomain-specific differences. Among technologists, users reported slightly better work–life balance than their non-user peers. Users reported slightly greater perceived control, particularly among technologists, suggesting modest gains in autonomy with growing familiarity and direct involvement in implementation. Stress at Work scores showed a mild but consistent improvement across the six-month period.Among patients (n=81), longitudinal PATSat-7 scores remained stable across all follow-up points. Subscales of the PATSat-C33, corresponding to satisfaction regarding technologist, physician, and service and care organization domains, underlined consistently high satisfaction across all aspects of care.

through 12 months and will benchmark PROs, dosimetric/clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction against conventional LINACs. References: 1. Ng J, Gregucci F, Pennell RT, Nagar H, Golden EB, Knisely JPS, et al. MRI-LINAC: A transformative technology in radiation oncology. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1117874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1117874.2. Easton S, Van Laar D. User manual for the Work-Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) Scale: a measure of quality of working life. University of Portsmouth; 2018.3. Brédart A, Anota A, Young T, Tomaszewski KA, Arraras JI, Moura De Albuquerque Melo H, et al. Phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer satisfaction with cancer care core questionnaire (EORTC PATSAT-C33) and specific complementary outpatient module (EORTC OUT- PATSAT7). Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018;27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12786. Keywords: Work-Related QOL, Patient Satisfaction, MRLINAC

Poster Discussion 2647

Spatially fractionated radiotherapy practice patterns – an EORTC-ESTRO SFRT Focus Group survey Dora Correia 1,2 , Mariangela Massaccesi 3 , Nina A. Mayr 4 , Nicolaus Andratschke 5 , Ester Orlandi 6,7 , Kevin Prise 8 , Robert J. Griffin 9 , Enrico Clementel 10 , Joost J.C. Verhoeff 11 , Slavisa Tubin 12 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Aargau, Switzerland. 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, University of Bern Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Gemelli ART, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. 4 College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. 5 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 6 Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. 7 Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO), Pavia, Italy. 8 Johnston Cancer Research Centre, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom. 9 Department Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. 10 Headquarters, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium. 11 Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 12 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria

Conclusion: Early human experience of MR-LINAC implementation at a high-volume academic center demonstrated excellent professional and patient tolerance. WRQoL remained stable, and patient satisfaction was high. The ongoing study will extend WRQoL assessment

Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online