10
HERRERA ET AL .
TABLE 3
Results of the guideline search
Database
Identified, potentially relevant guidelines
Critical appraisal
8 years old, recommendations not based on systematic evaluation of evidence, not applicable
Guideline International Network (GIN) International Guidelines Library a
Comprehensive periodontal therapy: a statement by the American Academy of Periodontology. American Academy of Periodontology. NGC:008726 (2011) HealthPartners Dental Group and Clinics guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of periodontal diseases. HealthPartners Dental Group. NGC:008848 (2011) Health Partners Dental Group and Clinics Caries Guideline
8 years old, unclear methodology, not applicable
Guidelinecentral.com “ Dentistry ” category The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) b National Guideline Clearinghouse (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) c Canadian Health Technology Assessment (CADTH) d
Not applicable
No thematically relevant hits
Not applicable
No thematically relevant hits
Not applicable
Periodontal Regenerative Procedures for Patients with Periodontal Disease: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness (2010) Treatment of Periodontal Disease: Guidelines and Impact (2010) Dental Scaling and Root Planing for Periodontal Health: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Guidelines (2016) Dental Cleaning and Polishing for Oral Health: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Cost- effectiveness and Guidelines (2013)
9-year-old review article, not applicable
9-year-old review article, not applicable
Unclear methodology (follow-up, outcome variables, recommendations, guideline group), not applicable Unclear methodology (follow-up, outcome variables, recommendations, guideline group), not applicable
EFP S3-Level CPG for stage I – III
European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) e American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) f
Indirectly applicable , high quality
Unclear methodology, 10-year-old consensus-based article, only limited clinically applicably recommendations, not applicable Unclear methodology (follow-up, outcome variables, recommendations, guideline group), almost a decade old, not applicable Unclear methodology, 10-year-old consensus-based article, only limited clinically applicably recommendations, not applicable
The American Journal of Cardiology and Journal of Periodontology Editors' Consensus: Periodontitis and Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease (2009)
Comprehensive Periodontal Therapy: A Statement by the American Academy of Periodontology (2011) Academy Statements on Gingival Curettage (2002), Local Delivery (2006), Risk Assessment (2008), Efficacy of Lasers (2011)
American Dental Association (ADA) g
Nonsurgical Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis Guideline (2015)
Outcome variable CAL (not PPD), no minimal follow-up — not applicable
a https://guidelines.ebmportal.com/. b https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/published?type c https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/index.html. d https://www.cadth.ca/. e http://www.efp.org/publications/index.html. f https://www.perio.org/publications. g https://ebd.ada.org/en/evidence/guidelines.
= csg,cg,mpg,ph,sg,sc.
3.2.3 | Focused questions
within this special issue of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology. The SRs were updated in July – September 2021, and the reports of the updates are presented as an Addendum to the present CPG. The Addendum is accessible online (CPGstage4-Addendum). All SRs were conducted following the “ Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses ” (PRISMA) framework (Moher et al., 2009), and were prospectively registered in PROSPERO.
In all 13 SRs, focused questions in PICOS format (Centre for reviews and dissemination, 2008; Guyatt et al., 2011) were proposed by the authors in January 2019 to a panel comprising the working group chairs and the methodological consultant in order to review and approve them (Table 4a – d). The panel took great care to avoid
Made with FlippingBook Annual report