Newton | From capital to delivery
This leads to a deeper structural issue. Infrastructure delivery is still largely organized around sequential phases with separate accountabilities: • development • permitting now matter 6
Why delivery models
Financing institutions are also becoming part of the delivery ecosystem, particularly where affordability, risk sharing and execution readiness are linked directly to funding availability. Execution readiness itself is becoming a financing criterion.
• engineering • procurement • construction • commissioning
Come to us with projects that are ready to go...” Gregory Beard Director of the DOE Office of Energy Dominance Financing
Each phase often has different owners, incentives, timelines, governance structures and performance measures. But the outcome often depends on the broader industrial complex working together across financing, permitting, transmission, supply chain and delivery systems. This creates a structural gap. Even where individual functions perform well, the broader delivery system can still fail to move at the pace required. This is not simply a capacity problem. It is a question of how delivery systems are:
Utilities are constantly balancing multiple strategic objectives simultaneously: • growth • reliability • affordability
• structured • integrated • orchestrated • managed end-to-end
• regulatory confidence • stakeholder legitimacy • execution readiness
These priorities need to be optimized together rather than independently. Affordability has become an execution outcome, not simply a regulatory outcome. Delivery predictability affects not only customer outcomes, but also:
• regulatory confidence • financing assumptions • investor credibility • long-term industrial competitiveness
15
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs