Gorffennol Winter Edition 23/24

In this manner, Rousseau impeaches Hobbes and Locke for failing to understand the true

human nature by ascribing to man innate rationality. As he puts it ‘They spoke about savage

man and they described civil man’. 15 By asserting that in this animal state humans had no

concept, hence, no fear of death, Rousseau refutes Hobbes’ argument about fear of death

being the most forceful aspect of human psychology. In the same vein, he attacks Locke on

the grounds of underesti mating man’s abilities to provide for himself in a solitary life and on

his claims on the existence of prolonged sexual and familial relations in the state of nature. 16

Also, contrary to Hobbes’ assertion that when man does not know good is evil, Rousseau

maintains that man in his pure State of Nature is good and that he has thereby justified

nature. 17 And good not in the moral sense but rather meaning simple since ‘one could say

that savages are not evil precisely because they do not know what it is to be good’. 18

Therefore, it is the formation of societies that degenerated man (who is now everywhere in

chains) by cumbering him with the burden of moral passions whose driving force is self-

interest. In that respect, Rousseau shares the same conviction with his predecessor in social

contract theory that this condition of self-interest and war must be overcome by a

convention.

Here lies the first influence of human nature in his theory. Although, for Rousseau,

human race of one age is not the same as another and the soul and human passions, which

can never be adequately satisfied, change their nature, this does not abolish that the current

condition is still part of human nature which he aims to alter. Thence lies the second

connection since altering means a promise that the human condition under his social contract

15 Rousseau, pp. 102-103. 16 John T. Scott, ‘The Theodicy of the Second Discourse: The "Pure State of Nature" and Rousseau's Political Thought’, The American Political Science Review, 86.3 (1992), 696-711 (pp. 700-703).

17 Rousseau, p. 193. 18 Rousseau, p. 128.

30

Made with FlippingBook HTML5