The Fundamentals (1910), Vol.1

Appendix.

121

ORR.

“The Bible under Trial.” (Armstrong & Son New York.) “The Problem of the Old Testament.” (Nesbit & Co.) Dr. Orr is one of the ablest and most scholarly writers in the English-speaking world today. “The Pentateuch. Its Origin and Structure.” (Scribner’s.) “Introduction to Genesis.” Printed in colors. Bissell is a careful scholar, and writes from the conservative side. Able, but not so firm as Green. “The Highest Critic vs. the Higher Critics.” (Revell.) By an evangelist, and therefore from the earnest rather than the expert standpoint. More to the level of the average reader than Green or Bissell. (Hodder & Stoughton.) Academic and technical; intensely interesting. His reasoning is not equally powerful throughout, however. ‘“The Bible and Modem Criticism.” (Revell.) The work of a layman, vigorous and earnest. He gives no uncertain sound. None Like It.” A plea for the old sword. (Revell.) Vigorous and slashing, too, but grand in the elo­ quence of its pleadings. Every minister should read it. Brimming with sanctified common sense. “The Early History of the Hebrews.” (Rivine- tons.) The chapter on the composition of the Pentateuch is very strong. “Moses and the Prophets.” (Nisbet.) A vigorous and unanswerable criticism of Driver’s treatment of the Pentateuch. “Old Testament Criticism and the Rights of the Unlearned.” (Revell.) A small and cheap book, but well worth study. a r “ oTn h t eo.)Higher Criticism.” (The Tract Societ ■y " , To­ /^m os t valuable little work. Thoroughly up-to-

ORR.

b is s E l l .

BISSELL.

MUNHALL.

MÖLLER. “Are the Critics Right?” (Revell.) By a former follower of Graf-Wellhausen and most interesting to the scholarly. Hardly suitable for the average reader, as it assumes familiarity with the technicalities of the German critical school. MARGOLIOUTH. “Lines of Defence of the Biblical Revelation.”

ANDERSON.

PARKER.

SAYCE.

WALLER.

KENNEDY.

SHERATON.

Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog