15 September 2020
HMRC ran a consultation that looked at the ways in which abuse in the Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) could be prevented. The CIPP, after hosting a survey and running a virtual roundtable think tank meeting, submitted a formal response, which can be located online. The consultation discussed a new power for HMRC to correct CIS deduction amounts claimed by sub-contractors on employer returns, detailed amendments to some of the CIS rules in order to confirm their meaning or expand their scope, and also looked at some preliminary ideas relating to construction supply chains and how they could potentially help to prevent tax loss. It was open from 19 March 2020 to 28 August 2020.
The key findings presented in the CIPP’s response were as follows:
• The proposed timing of corrections to be made is not long enough, and 14 days was deemed to be too short to enable any amendments, or to gain evidence to back up what’s been submitted • The majority of people are in agreement with the evidence requirements • Members raised concerns over how non-compliance will be notified • Questions were put forward around how HMRC would determine that a claim was not legitimate – i.e. what would instigate an investigation? • Software providers should be consulted with about how non-compliance will be actioned and communicated • Further guidance on compliance should be issued • Survey results confirmed that subcontractors were happy with compliance checks already carried out, and that any further official testing would be detrimental
The response can be read in its entirety here.
Back to Contents
Reminder – CIPP Survey – The Net Pay Anomaly: Call for evidence on pensions tax relief administration 18 September 2020 There’s still time for you to respond to the survey that the CIPP’s Policy and Research team have published, in order to collate the views of members and incorporate them into our formal response to the net pay anomaly: call for evidence on pensions tax relief administration. The survey focuses on the issue that arises for individuals who earn above £10,000, so over the auto-enrolment threshold, but below the current basic tax threshold of £12,500. In a net pay arrangement pension scheme, they will have a full pension deduction taken from their pay, without receiving any tax benefit on this contribution as they have not earned enough for tax to be applied to their earnings. If an individual is in a relief at source arrangement, however, they would only have 80% of the contribution deducted from their net pay, which would subsequently be topped up with 20% from HMRC, meaning that they would enjoy the benefit of tax relief. The government is concerned about the possible impact of this on a low-earning individual’s take-home pay, based on the method of pensions tax relief that is operated by the pension scheme that they are enrolled in. Intentions for the government to look into this were made clear in the Conservative manifesto 2019, which stated: “A number of workers, disproportionately women, who earn between £10,000 and £12,500 have been missing out on pension benefits because of a loophole affecting people with net pay pension schemes. We will conduct a comprehensive review to look at how to fix this issue.” The call for evidence aims to discuss improvements that can be made to the methods of administering pensions tax relief. Within the survey, we ask for your feedback on the government’s proposed methods of fixing the pensions anomaly issue. This is an important topic for payroll and pension professionals to have their say on, so although we understand you are all very busy, we would really appreciate any time you can dedicate to respond to the survey. It should take approximately 20 minutes to complete, and the survey will be open until 30 September 2020.
Back to Contents
The Chartered Institute of Payroll Professionals
Payroll: need to know
cipp.org.uk
Page 50 of 590
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker