IFMAT-IV Report

TASK F (continued)

IFMAT I – 1993 II – 2003 III - 2013

Recommendation Implementation Status

Recommendations in Response to Task F Findings

Forest Management Plan (continued)

Implement a management and oversight structure to ensure effective trust oversight in implementing plans that reflect the visions of individual tribes for forest sustainability. (IFMAT II – Primary Recommendation (2), page 17)

Not implemented for tribes under BIA program.

II

Forest Management Plan Development and Analysis

Tribal governments should periodically reevaluate their visions to reflect changing conditions and desires. (Recommendation 2, page III-14)

Tribal forest management plans are not being revaluated and updated on a regular basis. This is primarily due to funding and staffing limitations. Also contributing is the BIA policy on non-expiring plans. This has been reduced through the lack of support for the Integrated Resource Management plans and/ or not maintaining of the forest management plan. Each tribe should now have a forest management plan that lays out their tribal vision. Improving but not completely met. Shortage of multi-disciplinary planning staff makes it difficult to address key forest planning issues and perform fully integrated planning activities.

I

Develop tribal Visions to guide forest management objectives and practices through inclusive and continuing tribal public involvement programs. (IFMAT II Additional - (A), page 19) Each tribal government should consider developing a collective tribal vision where one does not now exist to guide management of tribal forests. (Recommendation 1, page III-14) Ensure that coordinated resource management plans guide Indian forest management via clearly defined objectives, standards, operations plans, and monitoring procedures. (Recommendation F1, page V-48) Change the definition of sustained yield management to one that focuses on the protection of underlying ecological processes and forest productivity. (Recommendation F3(a), page V-49) I Improve forest planning analysis: Make plan results accessible to the lay reader – graphs, figures, charts, etc. (Recommendation F3(b), page V-49) Improve forest planning analysis: Develop and analyze diverse set of alternatives. (Recommendation F3(c), page V-49) Improve forest planning analysis: Provide detailed timber supply discussion under the plan recommendations. (Recommendation F3(d), page V-49) Improve forest planning analysis: Modernize harvest scheduling techniques and up-to-date sustainability check. (Recommendation F3(e), page V-49) Improve forest planning analysis: Increase emphasis on operational planning to implement forest plans and IRMPs. (Recommendation F3(f), page V-49). Broaden and deepen the assessment of the ability of FMPs to sustain tribal forests and their benefits – make ‘achieving the tribal vision on a continuing basis the definition of sustainability. (Recommendation F1, page 80)

II

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

II

Appendix v – IFMAT I-III Crosswalk Table of Recommendations A-49

Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator