to oil and gas lease burdens like common royalty and overriding royalty is crucial for accurately calculating the PPI in Oklahoma. The PPI is determined by adding the net revenue interest of a working interest owner to any additional subsequently created interests (such as overriding royalties) burdening that working interest, then dividing this sum by one minus the royalty share. This approach adjusts for the complexities introduced by different royalty and overriding royalty burdens, ensuring that each owner receives their rightful share of production. The calculation method underlines the necessity to clearly delineate these interests because the presence of overriding royalties or other burdens can significantly alter how revenue is distributed among stakeholders. In practical terms, this segmentation ensures that the royalty owner’s share, as stipulated by their lease agreement, is not diminished by subsequent interests carved out from the working interest. Table 2 is formatted for this purpose, by among other things, linking the overriding royalty interests to the leases they burden as indicated in the “ORRI” column.
attributes that have made it a popular choice across various jurisdictions. However, as Paul Yale insightfully notes:
In any event multi-tract opinions are becoming more and more the norm, even in Texas. The entire production sharing/allocation well debate in Texas is arguably driven because of weak forced pooling laws. I predict that over time Texas opinions will be looking more and more like Oklahoma and Rocky Mountain opinions as horizontal units get larger and allocation well drilling becomes more common.
This observation underscores a trend where even Texas is moving towards practices that resemble those in Oklahoma, acknowledging the challenges of multi-tract units and the necessity for detailed ownership segmentation. Oklahoma’s legal framework, with its strong emphasis on forced pooling, multi-tract development, and royalty owner protection, demands a tailored approach to title opinions. The state’s laws, like the Production Revenue Standards Act and the Natural Gas Market Sharing Act, along with the obligation to pay interest on suspended proceeds, require title opinions to be more detailed and segmented than the Texas model might allow for in its current form. Thus, while Texas-style title opinions can serve as an excellent starting point, they must be significantly adapted to meet Oklahoma’s specific needs. This adaptation involves not just tweaking the format but fundamentally rethinking how ownership interests are formatted and presented to align with industry customs and practices as shaped by state laws. As the oil and gas sector evolves with larger, more intricate units, the interplay between Texas and Oklahoma’s methods may foster further integration. However, currently, Oklahoma exemplifies the need for localized strategies in title opinion formatting—demonstrating that a one-size- fits-all approach is not practical or effective in this context.
5. Sharing of Force-Pooled Acreage
Under Oklahoma law, as stated in Woolley v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma , 2011 OK CIV APP 90, 261 P.3d 1181, operators are obligated to share pooled acreage with non-operators, even when those non-operators were inadvertently excluded from earlier pooling orders due to title recognition errors. The Woolley case underscores the necessity for clear identification of force- pooled acreage in title opinions, emphasizing that operators have a legal duty to offer each non- operator their proportionate share of such acreage.
Oklahoma’s Title Terrain: Where Texas Templates Meet Local Law:
In conclusion, while the Texas Form Title Opinion offers a robust framework for standardizing oil and gas title practices, its direct application in Oklahoma presents significant challenges due to the state’s unique legal and operational landscape. The Texas model, with its emphasis on uniformity and simplicity, has undeniably positive
25
G rowth T hrough E ducat i on - A pr i l / M ay / J une 2025
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker