AAAS EPI Center and GLLC Roundtables

PFAS Risk Communications | AAAS EPI Center

Table 1 – Theoretical PFAS Scenarios and Potential Risk Communication Response

Issue: PFAS concentrations for two PFAS of concern are reported in multiple drinking water samples after a state sampling campaign to characterize water quality, however the levels are below federal and state PFAS guidance levels. A nearby industrial discharger is expected to be the source of the PFAS but has not been confirmed. Community Reaction: Community leaders are concerned about the reported PFAS levels and associated health risks. One public health advocacy group has advised the public not to drink tap water. Potential Response: Leadership Efforts: • Assess the level of public health risk by discussing the potential health impacts from the current PFAS levels with state public health agencies. If necessary, release a “do not drink” health advisory for sensitive populations. • Work with the state’s environmental department to conduct additional sampling upstream of the drinking water treatment plant and identify the source of contamination. • If health impacts are identified from the public health study, discuss treatment options with the local drinking water utility to determine feasible methods for reduction of PFAS. • Through this effort, work with legislators and other government officials to determine if state funding is required to support the efforts of health agencies and local utilities. Community Outreach: • Develop a public statement to share the results of the drinking water PFAS sampling and proposed next steps to mitigate the issue. • Hold a public meeting with community interest groups (such as environmental advocates, community leaders) to share the current state of knowledge and listen to feedback and concerns. • After the health risk is understood, disseminate information in the forms of press releases, social media, and town meetings to advise residents and obtain feedback.

33

Made with FlippingBook Online document