DEBATE METODOLÓGICO EN TORNO AL 'REGIONAL INNOVATION SCOREBOARD'
DEBATE METODOLÓGICO EN TORNO AL 'REGIONAL INNOVATION SCOREBOARD'
J. M., Barbero, J., y Zofío, J. L. (2018). On the meaning of innovation perfor- mance: Is the syn - thetic indicator of the Innovation Union Scoreboard flawed? Research Evaluation, 27 (3), 196-211. European Parliament (2000). Lisbon Euro - pean Council, 23 and 24 March 2000. Pre - sidency conclusions. https://www.euro - parl.europa.eu/sum - mits/lis1_en.htm. European Union (2016). Regional Innovation Score - board. Publications Office of the Euro - pean Union. European Union (2021a). European Innovation Score - board 2021. Publi- cations Office of the European Union. European Union (2021b). Regional In - novation Scoreboard 2021. Publications Office of the Euro - pean Union. Filippetti, A., y Peyra - che, A. (2011). The Patterns of Techno - logical Capabilities of Countries: A Dual Approach using Composite Indica -
tors. World Develo- pment, 39 (7), 1108- 1121. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Per- formance: Lessons from Japan. Frances Pinter. Freeman, C. (1995). The «National Sys - tem of Innovation» in historical pers- pective. Cambridge Journal of Econo - mics, 19 (1), 5-24. Freeman, C., y Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indi- cators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38 (4), 583-589. Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., y Torrisi, G. (2019). On the Methodolo - gical Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61-94. Grupp, H., y Schu - bert, T. (2010). Review and new evi- dence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating na - tional performance.
Research Policy, 39 (1), 67-78.
the need for posi- tioning them where they properly belong.
tionary economic geography (pp. 62- 92). Edward Elgar. Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-orien - ted innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corpo - rate Change, 27 (5), 803-815. Metcalfe, J. S. (1995). Technology systems and techno- logy policy in an evo - lutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, (19), 25-46. Michelson, E. S. (2006). Approaches to research and development perfor- mance assessment in the United States: an analysis of recent evaluation trends. Science and Public Policy, 33 (8), 546- 560. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Taran - tola, S., Hoffmann, A., y Giovannini, E. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indica - tors. Methodology and user guide. OECD/Eurostat. Nelson, R. R., y Romer, P. M. (1996). Science, Economic
Growth, and Public Policy. Challenge, 39(1), 9-21. Palmberg, C. (2006). The sources and success of inno- vations – Deter - minants of com- mercialisation and break-even times. Technovation, (26), 1253-1267. Paruolo, P., Saisa - na, M., y Saltelli, A. (2013). Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 176 (3), 609-634. Rodríguez-Pose, A., y Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and Deve- lopment, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42 (1), 51-67. Salazar-Elena, J. C., Guimón, J., López López, A., Sánchez Muñoz, M. A., y Lan - deta, J. (2020). Mo- delos de innovación abierta. Una aproxi - mación autonómica. Fundación COTEC para la Innovación. Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indica- tors between analy- sis and advocacy.
Social Indicators Re - search, (81), 65-77. Samara, E., Georgia - dis, P., y Bakouros, I. (2012). The impact of innovation poli- cies on the perfor- mance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis. Technova - tion, (32), 624-638. Schibany, A., y Strei - cher, G. (2008). The European innovation scoreboard: Drowning by numbers? Science Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Econo - mics, 70 (1), 65-94. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Eco - nomics and Statis- tics, 39 (3), 312-320. Tarabusi, E. C., y Palazzi, P. (2004). An index for sustainable development. PSL Quarterly Review, 57 (229), 185-206. Taylor, M. Z. (2016). The Politics of Inno - vation: Why Some Countries Are Better and Public Policy, 35(10), 717-732.
Than Others at Science and Techno - logy. Oxford Univer - sity Press. Tol, R. S., y Yohe, G. W. (2007). The weakest link hypo - thesis for adaptive capacity: an empiri- cal test. Global Envi - ronmental Change, 17 (2), 218-227. Zabala-Iturriagagoi - tia, J. M., Aparicio, J., Ortiz, L., Carayannis, E. G., y Grigoroudis, E. (2021). The pro - ductivity of national innovation systems in Europe: Catching up or falling behind? Technovation, (102), 102215. Zabala-Iturria - gagoitia, J. M., Jiménez-Sáez, F., Castro-Martínez, E., y Gutiérrez-Gracia, A. (2007a). What indicators do (or do not) tell us about Regional Innovation Systems. Scientome- trics, 70 (1), 85-106. Zabala-Iturriagagoi - tia, J. M., Voigt, P., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., y Jiménez-Sáez, F. (2007b). Regional Innovation Systems: How to Assess Performance . Regio - nal Studies, 41 (5), 661-672.
Harrison, G. W., y Hirshleifer, J. (1989). An experimental eva - luation of weakest link/best shot models of public goods. The Journal of Political Economy, (97), 201–225. Hauser, C., Siller, M., Schatzer, T., Walde, J., y Tappeiner, G. (2018). Measuring regional innovation: A critical inspec- tion of the ability of single indicators to shape technological change. Technolo - gical Forecasting and Social Change, (129), 43-55. Hollanders, H., y Es-Sadki, N. (2021). European Innovation Scoreboard 2021 – Main Report. Publi- cations Office of the European Union. Janger, J., Schubert, T., Andries, P., Ram - mer, C., y Hoskens, M., (2017). The EU 2020 innovation indi - cator: A step forward in measuring innova - tion outputs and out- comes? Research Policy, (46), 30-42. Koz ł owski, J. (2015). Innovation indices:
Scientometrics, 104(3), 609-628.
Lafuente, E., Ács, Z. J., y Szerb, L. (2021). A composite indi- cator analysis for optimizing entrepre - neurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 104379. Lane, J. (2010). Let’s make science me - trics more scientific. Nature, 464 (7288), 488-489. Lundvall, B. A. (Ed.) (1992). National Sys- tems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter. Mairesse, J., y Mohnen, P. (2009). Innovation Surveys and Innovation Poli - cy. En D. Foray (Ed.), The New Economics of Technology Policy (pp. 215-230). Ed - ward Elgar. Martin, R., y Sunley, P. (2010). The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the economic landsca- pe. En R. Boschma y R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolu -
84
85
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker