Net pay arrangement for defined contribution (DC) funds 29 June 2017
Businesses who use a net pay arrangement for defined contribution (DC) funds should reconsider enrolling their lowest earners into that scheme, Baroness Ros Altmann has said.
Professional Pensions has reported that the former pensions minister said members might blame employers. Employees earning less than £11,500 - the personal tax allowance - will miss out on a 25% government bonus, provided via tax credit, if they are put through this system.
As these employees will still pay the same proportion in contributions as higher earners, but will not get any reimbursement through tax credits, they will then end up paying more for the same pension.
Speaking at Pensions and Benefits UK on 27 June, Altmann urged businesses to take a better look at their workforce and these funds, stating it could prove to be a future scandal.
"If you have not looked into the issue of net pay schemes and you do have lower earners, please do. A net pay administration scheme is not suitable for workers who earn under £11,500.
Unless somebody makes up the 25% government bonus they cannot get, you are forcing these lowest paid earners to pay for more than they should. It could be a future scandal.
If they discover they paid that 25% because of their employer's choice of pension administration, who will they blame and what will they ask? You need to think about that."
In contrast, 'relief at source' arrangements mean members pay tax before contributions are paid to the scheme, thereby meaning non-taxpayers do not lose out on any funds.
Read more from Professional Pensions .
Back to Contents
Retirement income gender gap grows by £1,000 3 July 2017
The gap between women’s and men’s annual average expected retirement incomes in 2017 has grown by £1,000 in the last year, according to new research from Prudential .
The unique annual research has, over the last 10 years, tracked the future financial plans and aspirations of people planning to retire in the year ahead. This year’s Class of 2017 research shows that women expecting to retire this year will be £6,400 a year worse off on average than their male counterparts, and nearly £200 a year worse off than women who retired in 2016. Women this year expect an average annual retirement income of £14,300, which is the second highest on record although slightly down on the £14,500 for those retiring in 2016. This year’s female retirees are feeling slightly more confident about their finances; however, with 50 per cent saying they are financially well-prepared for retirement, compared with 48 per cent in 2016. Meanwhile, as women’s incomes stagnate, men’s expected retirement incomes have shown a fifth consecutive year of growth. Men retiring this year expect an annual retirement income of £20,700 – £900 a year more than last year which is helping drive the gender gap to its highest level for three years. The Prudential study, which has tracked the retirement income gender gap for 10 years, shows that men retiring this year will be 45 per cent better-off than women. The gender gap was at its widest in 2008 when the average expected retirement income for men was 84 per cent higher than that expected by women.
Kirsty Anderson, a retirement income expert at Prudential, said:
“…For anyone who takes a career break, maintaining pension contributions and, where possible, making voluntary National Insurance contributions after returning to work, should help to minimise the impact on their retirement income. The best way to secure a good quality of life in retirement is to save as much as possible from as early as possible in
The Chartered Institute of Payroll Professionals
Policy News Journal
cipp.org.uk
Page 439 of 516
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker