a)
requesting a priority copy of the learner’s script to support a review of marking by the awarding organisation deadline, or (where the option is made available by the awarding organisation) viewing the learner’s marked script online to consider if requesting a review of marking is appropriate.
b)
3. Collect informed written consent/permission from the learner to access their script. 4. On access to the script, consider if it is felt that the agreed mark scheme has been applied correctly in the original marking and if the centre considers there are any errors in the marking. 5. Support a request for the appropriate RoR service (clerical re-check or review of marking) if any error is identified. 6. Collect informed written consent from the learner to request the RoR service before the request is submitted. 7. Where relevant, advise an affected learner to inform any third party (such as a university or college) that a review of marking has been submitted to an awarding organisation. Written learner consent (informed consent via learner email is acceptable) is required in all cases before a request for a RoR service 1 or 2 (including priority service 2) is submitted to the awarding organisation. Consent is required to confirm the learner understands that the final subject grade and/or mark awarded following a clerical re-check or a review of marking, and any subsequent appeal, may be lower than, higher than, or the same as the result which was originally awarded. Learner consent must only be collected after the publication of results. For any moderated components that contributed to the final result, the centre will: • Confirm that a review of moderation cannot be undertaken on the work of an individual learner or the work of learners not in the original sample submitted for moderation. • Consult any moderator report/feedback to identify any issues raised. • Determine if the centre’s internally assessed marks have been accepted without change by the awarding organisation – if this is the case, a RoR service 3 (Review of moderation) will not be available. • Determine if there are any grounds to submit a request for a review of moderation for the work of all learners in the original sample.
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker