Western Growers’ Position Western Growers and its coalition argue that the public interest is best served by maintaining a fair and transparent union certification process. We assert that AB 113’s procedures are deeply flawed and pose a significant risk of erroneous and coerced union certifications. The coalition believes that a judicial review is essential to address these constitutional concerns and to prevent potential disruptions in the agricultural industry. Conclusion The lawsuit filed by Wonderful Nurseries against AB 113 is a critical juncture for California’s agricultural labor relations. The court’s decision on the preliminary injunction will not only impact Wonderful Nurseries but also set a precedent for the future of union certifications in the state. As this case unfolds, it will be crucial for all stakeholders in the agricultural sector to stay informed and engaged in the legal proceedings to ensure that the rights of both workers and employers are upheld. Stay tuned for updates on this important case and its implications for California agriculture.
Counsel for Wonderful Nurseries • Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
• David A. Schwarz • Barbara E. Taylor
• Barsamian & Moody
• Ronald H. Barsamian • Seth G. Mehrten
• Roll Law Group P.C.
• Kristina M. Diaz Organizations Signing onto the Amicus Brief • Western Growers Association • Agricultural Council of California • California Citrus Mutual • California Farm Bureau Federation • Grower-Shipper Association of Central California • Grower-Shipper Association of San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties • Ventura County Agricultural Association • The California Cotton Ginners and Growers Association • Western Agricultural Processors Association • California Association of Winegrape Growers
Amicus Counsel • Irell & Manella LLP • Bruce A. Wessel
7 Western Grower & Shipper | www.wga.com July | August 2024
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker