AI ETHICS PART III: Practical Guidance For Defense Lawyers
Parts I and II of this white paper established what generative AI is, how it functions, and the ethical framework governing its use. This Part translates that foundation into practical guidance that defenders can implement immediately. It addresses tool selection, risk assessment, verification protocols, and the development of comprehensive AI use policies. A. Practical Guidance for Defense Lawyers
1.
Identification of Enterprise v. Personal Tools
Defender offices and firms have an imperative to provide at least some AI tools to defenders. Both defenders and staff will use AI regardless of whether their offices have adopted formal policies because the tools are too accessible and the workload pressures are too acute to expect otherwise. AI has entered and will likely become a focal point of defenders’ day-to-day practice. The question is whether it will permeate through sanctioned systems and tools with appropriate safeguards or through ad hoc individual use that risks confidentiality breaches and ethical violations. Providing vetted, secure AI tools is a matter of client protection. Moreover, a growing body of commentary suggests that the failure to leverage AI may itself raise competence concerns under professional responsibility rules, as attorneys who forgo efficiency-enhancing technologies may be unable to provide representation comparable to that of AI-assisted prosecutors. Defenders must distinguish between AI tools available through organizational subscriptions and those accessible for personal use. This distinction carries significant implications for confidentiality, security, and appropriate use cases.
33
Parity in Practice: The Defender’s Duty to Ethically Use AI
Made with FlippingBook Online document maker