AI ETHICS 49. Eric Friedman, Adrienne Busby, and Erica Moran, Understanding the Rule 702 Amendments, A m . B ar A ss ’ n , Apr. 15, 2024, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/resources/newsletters/ corporate-counsel/understanding-rule-702-amendments/ .
50. Michael L. Huggins and Hannah L. McMeans, Proposed New Federal Rule Regarding AI-Generated Evidence, M eyers N ave , Feb. 18, 2026, https://www.meyersnave.com/proposed-new-federal-rule-regarding-ai-generated-evidence/ .
51. Nat’l Ass’n Criminal. Def. Lawyers, Comments to Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 702, https://www.nacdl.org/ getattachment/8474211d-c05b-43a1-ae95-9dbe2b65b19c/nacdl-comments-on-proposed-amendments-to- federal-rule-of-evidence-707-02162026.pdf.
52. Rebecca A. Delfino, Deepfakes on Trial: A Call to Expand the Trial Judge’s Gatekeeping Role to Protect Legal Proceedings from Technological Fakery , 74 H astings L. J. 293 (2023).
53. John P. LaMonaga, A Break From Reality: Modernizing Authentication Standards for Digital Video Evidence in the Era of Deepfakes, 69 Am. Univ. L. Rev. 1945 (2020).
54. Judge Paul Grimm (Ret.) & Dr. Maura Grossman, A dvisory C omm . on E vidence R ules , Agenda, Proposed New Rule 901(c) to Address “Deepfakes,” at 18 (Apr. 19, 2024).
55. Standing Orders, Local Rules, and Decisions on the Use of AI, Ropes & Gray LLP, last updated Jan. 8, 2026, https://www. ropesgray.com/en/sites/artificial-intelligence-court-order-tracker .
56. Supra note 31.
57. ABA T ask F orce on L aw and A rtificial I ntelligence , Year 2 Report on the Impact of AI on the Practice of Law (Dec. 2025), https://www.americanbar.org/groups/leadership/office_of_the_president/ai-task-force/ .
58. In Focus: Artificial Intelligence (AI) , B loomberg L aw , Mar. 9, 2026, https://www.bloomberglaw.com/external/page/ infocus_artificial_intelligence .
59. AI and Attorney Ethics Rules: 50-State Survey , JUSTIA, Apr. 2025, https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/ai-and- attorney-ethics-rules-50-state-survey/ .
60. Simshaw, Access to A.I. Justice, supra note 18 at 157.
61. Id. at 181.
62. Id. at 182; see Agnieszka McPeak, Disruptive Technology and the Ethical Lawyer , 50 U. TOL. L. REV. 457 at 471 (2019) (writing, “[T]echnology has been integrated into the very act of practicing law. The core activity of lawyering—that of thinking like a lawyer—is expressed through the technology lawyers use. At its core, technology is not merely a tool of the trade, but it is wrapped up intrinsically in the very thought processes lawyers employ.”).
53
Parity in Practice: The Defender’s Duty to Ethically Use AI
Made with FlippingBook Online document maker