unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby: For through him we both have ac cess by one Spirit unto the Father.” Particularly note the references to the blood of Christ in this chapter — this is essential to the atonement! The Book of Hebrews tells us, both by in ference and statement, that . . with out the shedding of blood there is no re mission” (9:22). Hebrews, among other books, states that the blood of the sin less Son of God was the only means by which atonement could be accom plished. However, all who have a life at stake in the atonement are not will fully enmeshed in open conflict. Frank ly, I have never been a vocal partici pant in theological debate on this issue. Like most of you, my belief in Christ as the all-sufficient Saviour, nev er for one moment rested on any theo logian’s ability to explain or defend an item of doctrine. But, whether one is on the front lines of theological de bate or not, he certainly should know where he stands. Unhesitatingly I take my stand beneath the Cross of Jesus. For me, Christ’s death was full atone ment for my sin.
Although an understanding of all the aspects of the atonement is not a prerequisite to salvation, we rejoice to see the marvelous and righteous way in which God provided the perfect avenue of restoration for sinful man. I take my stand with those who be lieve in the atonement—not only be cause I have a personal need of an atoning Saviour, but also because I believe the atonement to be distinctly taught in the Bible. Now I have presented this doctrine in the framework of a battle, remem bering that in warfare there are only three possible positions: those who de fend, those who attack, and those who observe—or the neutrals. Are the at tackers more constructive than the de fenders? Obviously not. And what of the neutrals—is theirs a choice posi tion? At times, yes. It is certainly bet ter to withhold judgment than to make a rash decision on insufficient evidence. But the doctrine of the atonement is crucial in Christianity. Anyone who purports to be a Christian has had to decide to what extent he draws upon the Grace of God. Neutrality is an un tenable position for one who lays claim to the name Christian. We Believe
Bodily Resurrection of Christ
William Bynum, D.R.E. Professor of Christian Education get crucified and rise again on the third day.” These great proofs of Chris tianity — such as the resurrection — and central themes of doctrine cannot be placed in order of importance for all are as supporting stones of a huge (continued on next page) 13
I t has b e e n said that a friend once asked Talleyrand, Bishop of Autun, and one of the most astute men who ever lived: “The Christian religion —- what is it? It would be easy to start a religion like that.” “Oh, yes,” replied Talleyrand. “One would only have to
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker