TVA’s wasteful scheme to sit methane power plant miles from delivery source Consider Alternative Methane Plant Locations = Significant cost reduction
Waste compared to Savings Alternative land availability .................................. 1 Number of Homes Affected ............................. 2, 3 Topographical challenges ............................... 4, 5 Roads rated to haul heavy loads .................... 6, 7 Bridges rated to haul heavy loads................. 8, 9 Evaluation of rail bridge strength ................. 10,11 Plan to construct rail gantry to move equipment to trucks & trailers ................................ 12, 13, 14 Powerline distances, cost more .................. 15, 16 Ample & limited water resources ............... 17, 18 Industrial resources ......................... 19, 20, 21, 22 Flooding causes loss ................................... 23, 24
The TVA’s willingness to unnecessarily spend literally millions upon millions on the Cheatham location defies all levels of common-sense, reason and efficiency. The TVA owes Americans an account of their Waste, Accountability and lack of Self-Regulation. This visual Report highlights the pros of choosing a better plant location and cons of using the proposed TVA’s rural Cheatham County location. Sitting this plant in rural Cheatham is fiscally irresponsible and totally impractical. The proposed TVA Cheatham methane plant is yet an- other example of an out-of-control federal agency that needs “Governmental Oversight” with immediate scru- tiny for Waste, Accountability, Corruption and Abuse.
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker