Clinical Benefits & The Löwenstein Difference

4 5

SLEEP MEDICINE | V. ISETTA ET AL.

3 Buchner NJ, Sanner BM, Borgel J, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure treatment of mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea reduces cardiovascular risk. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 176: 1274 – 1280. 4 Haentjens P, Van Meerhaeghe A, Moscariello A, et al. The impact of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: evidence from a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 757 – 764. 5 Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, et al. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet 2005; 365: 1046 – 1053. 6 Engleman HM, Douglas NJ. Sleep. 4: Sleepiness, cognitive function, and quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea/ hypopnoea syndrome. Thorax 2004; 59: 618 – 622. 7 Barbé F, Durán-Cantolla J, Capote F, et al. Long-term effect of continuous positive airway pressure in hypertensive patients with sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: 718 – 726. 8 Weaver TE, Sawyer AM. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea: implications for future interventions. Indian J Med Res 2010; 131: 245 – 258. 9 Ayas NT, Patel SR, Malhotra A, et al. Auto-titrating versus standard continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: results of a meta-analysis. Sleep 2004; 27: 249 – 253. 10 Behbehani K, Yen FC, Lucas EA, et al. A sleep laboratory evaluation of an automatic positive airway pressure system for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 1998; 21: 485 – 491. 11 d ’ Ortho MP, Grillier-Lanoir V, Levy P, et al. Constant vs. automatic continuous positive airway pressure therapy: home evaluation. Chest 2000; 118: 1010 – 1017. 12 Massie CA, McArdle N, Hart RW, et al. Comparison between automatic and fixed positive airway pressure therapy in the home. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 20 – 23. 13 Randerath WJ, Galetke W, Ruhle KH. Auto-adjusting CPAP based on impedance versus bilevel pressure in difficult-to-treat sleep apnea syndrome: a prospective randomized crossover study. Med Sci Monit 2003; 9: CR353 – CR358. 14 Teschler H, Wessendorf TE, Farhat AA, et al. Two months auto-adjusting versus conventional nCPAP for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J 2000; 15: 990 – 995. 15 Marrone O, Insalaco G, Bonsignore MR, et al. Sleep structure correlates of continuous positive airway pressure variations during application of an autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure machine in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 2002; 121: 759 – 767. 16 Noseda A, Kempenaers C, Kerkhofs M, et al. Constant vs auto-continuous positive airway pressure in patients with sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome and a high variability in pressure requirement. Chest 2004; 126: 31 – 37. 17 Oksenberg A, Silverberg DS, Arons E, et al. The sleep supine position has a major effect on optimal nasal continuous positive airway pressure: relationship with rapid eye movements and non-rapid eye movements sleep, body mass index, respiratory disturbance index, and age. Chest 1999; 116: 1000 – 1006. 18 Penzel T, Moller M, Becker HF, Effect of sleep position and sleep stage on the collapsibility of the upper airways in patients with sleep apnea. Sleep 2001; 24: 90 – 95. 19 Series F, Marc I. Importance of sleep stage- and body position-dependence of sleep apnoea in determining benefits to auto-CPAP therapy. Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 170 – 175. 20 Woehrle H, Graml A, Weinreich G. Age- and gender-dependent adherence with continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Sleep Med 2011; 12: 1034 – 1036. 21 Ip S, D ’ Ambrosio C, Patel K, et al. Auto-titrating versus fixed continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Syst Rev 2012; 1: 20. 22 Farré R, Montserrat JM, Rigau J, et al. Response of automatic continuous positive airway pressure devices to different sleep breathing patterns: a bench study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 469 – 473. 23 Rigau J, Montserrat JM, Wöhrle H, et al. Bench model to simulate upper airway obstruction for analyzing automatic continuous positive airway pressure devices. Chest 2006; 130: 350 – 361. 24 Abdenbi F, Chambille B, Escourrou P. Bench testing of auto-adjusting positive airway pressure devices. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 649 – 658.

ERJ Open Res 2015; 1: 00031 ‐ 2015 | DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00031-2015

6

next generation sourcing

Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter