04:05 APAC
stream is going to react in its own way. Correcting the net pay is a great outcome, but inconsistent records supporting that are what attracts unwanted regulator attention. So, you’ve corrected the pay but do all your systems tell the same story: tax withholding, super, and realtime payroll reporting, also, payroll tax and workers’ compensation? All these five reporting streams rely on the same thing; correctly classified earnings, but they want that information expressed in their own quirky way depending on the regulator and/or state. Your first stop is PAYG. Backpayments sit under the ATO’s “additional payments” rules, which means Schedule 5 withholding and a full reconciliation across the pay run, the ledger, your reporting outputs, and the year-to-date figures employees see when they log into myGov. The calculation isn’t the hard bit here, it is keeping the numbers consistent everywhere, because inconsistency is what stands out later. Next up is Superannuation, where it gets even trickier. If underpayments have happened, you can expect the SG to be
So, you’ve corrected the pay but do all your systems tell the same story: tax withholding, super, and realtime payroll reporting, also, payroll tax and workers’ compensation?
correction pushes through PAYG, Super Guarantee (SG), Single Touch Payroll (STP), payroll tax, and workers’ compensation, and if those numbers don’t all move together, something will eventually light up on a regulator’s screen. The underpayment headlines end at employee payment. The risk doesn’t. We’ve all heard the narrative; underpayments tend to start in the same places. Rules that weren’t kept up to date, rotten time data, or interpretations that were never written down or just assumed. And when those foundations wobble, it doesn’t just create underpayments; it creates mismatched reporting over months or even years. Change one earnings type and every reporting
38 I 04:05
GLOBAL PAYROLL MAGAZINE ISSUE 21
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online