BUSINESS SUPPORT GREEN BELT MYTHS
DEBUNKING GREEN BELT MYTHS
Discussions about building on the UK’s green belt are often emotional, but the reality is many misconceptions persist around these contentious areas
B uilding new homes is more Starmer said late last year. Many reacted strongly against this proposal, wanting to maintain the sanctity of the green belt. But how accurate are the beliefs people hold about these hallowed pieces of land? 1 The green belt is pristine land The green belt is not actually full of unspoiled, natural landscapes. It includes low-quality farmland, golf courses, and even industrial areas – spaces that could be some of the areas earmarked for the government’s grey belt, which refers to land that does not strongly contribute to green belt purposes of public enjoyment, conservation, or biodiversity. 2 The green belt exists to protect the environment The primary purpose of the green belt, introduced in the 1950s, is to stop cities from expanding and to encourage regeneration of urban areas. The green belt does support wildlife, important than safeguarding the green belt. This was what Prime Minister Keir but there is also plenty that is taken up by heavily farmed areas or overly developed land that provides little ecological benefit.
3 The UK is running out of space Green belt land covers around 13 per cent of England’s total land area. Urban development accounts for just 10 per cent. There is still land available for development and providing people with homes; however, much of the area is restricted due to green belt policies. What is needed for small builders and developers is a balanced approach that identifies areas for responsible development without unnecessarily limiting growth. 4 Building on the green belt would solve the housing crisis Building on the green belt would provide more housing but it would not on its own solve the shortage. Factors at play include: ● Planning restrictions ● Infrastructure limitations ● Affordability concerns Releasing green belt land without addressing these issues could mean homes are built in the wrong places or at the wrong prices. 5 The green belt is permanent Green belt boundaries change. Local authorities will review the land and make decisions to expand or contract the green belt in response to needs.
The false belief about the green belt’s permanence is part of the reason for people’s resistance to potential revisions. Builders should know that adjustments do happen, which provides opportunities for developments in appropriate areas. 6 Building on the green belt would ruin rural communities Far from ruining rural communities, sensible developments could be beneficial. Many rural areas suffer from declining populations, ageing demographics, and struggling local economies. Developments that sustain the local culture and character could expand the populations, create jobs, and support local services. 7 Brownfield developments will solve the crisis Just like developing green belt land won’t solve the housing crisis, building on brownfield sites can only help to ease the shortage. Remediating these sites often carry high costs, which make them less likely to be used for affordable housing. These sites also tend to be in low-demand areas compared with green belt land. Reconsidering green belt boundaries and remediating brownfield sites together will help to increase new housing stock.
Master Builder 22
www.fmb.org.uk
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter maker