Challenges
6. We found significant gaps in reaching particular audiences including youth, tribal and BIPOC communities . With regard to youth programming, the lack of coordination and leadership is particularly troubling given the potential STEM focus of climate change and extreme weather programming and the need to reach this next generation of leaders. We also note there are only a few tribal programs, which is concerning given the vulnerability of many tribal populations to climate change and extreme weather impacts as well as the potential for the sharing of indigenous knowledge tied to climate change and extreme weather patterns. Another gap is the intersectionality with BIPOC communities and lack of resources and opportunities addressing inclusion and climate issues, particularly those with a climate justice focus. 7. Several respondents described situations of Extension administrative and/or collegial censorship related to climate change programming . Threats or attempts to passively preclude or actively censor Extension professionals from engaging in science and evidenced-based climate and extreme weather programming is counter to common standards of academic freedom and, given the ‘objective and research - based’ foundation upon which Extension bases its programming, should be condemned and addressed immediately. 8. We heard several ardent criticisms of traditional Extension programming and inability to evolve and innovate. Specifically, there were multiple references to the ‘good ol’ boy’ mentality with administrative support structures resistant to working on climate change. Similarly, we documented several references to Extension’s re lationship to industry and fear of jeopardizing funding. There were also references to a lack of leadership and commitment to serving the public trust. 9. The topic of climate change is often cited as polarizing and poses a challenge to Extension professionals, who often find the science, especially the uncertainty, confusing and the political atmosphere challenging. Further, support to address the politicization of the topic can be lacking from colleagues, partners and administrators. Respondents also described the potential political implications and concerns for retribution in providing particular aspects of science- based information. 10. Our interview respondents revealed ongoing challenges with communication, specifically terminology choice and message framing when working with certain audiences and clientele. Examples included being careful with word choice around supervisors or depending on the constituency particularly as it pertains to climate change. Certain words and concepts were avoided so as to not offend or alienate others. We note word choice is less about scientific knowledge and understanding associated with terms and concepts, but rather the political implications of what and how certain science was presented. The prevalence of this challenge among early adopters of climate and extreme weather Extension programs also suggests an
48
Powered by FlippingBook