CTO/05
2026
FEATURE ARTICLE
THE DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY GAP
An Individual, Community, Governmental, and National Imperative
BY MALETHEBA LESA MAKOELE
You are a digital citizen, whether you signed up to be one or not. Every search, scroll, login, and silent piece of data you leave behind makes you part of a global digital economy. It has its own rules of engagement, but so far, very few of the protections you take for granted in the physical world. That gap is what I want to talk about. Specifically: what is digital sovereignty for an individual, their community , for a government, and for the nation as a collective unit? The working definition I will be defending is that digital sovereignty is the right of individuals, governments, and nations to exercise meaningful agency over their data, their digital identity, and the systems that increasingly shape their lives . Each of those scales, individual (micro), community (meso), and national/government (macro), has its own stakes, and I want to walk through all three.
WHY THIS CONVERSATION, WHY NOW
As someone born in the ’90s, I marvel at where we are, but I’m also thinking harder about where we’re going. When Facebook first launched, no one on the founding team imagined that decades later, governments would scramble to regulate the psychological and social fallout. The reason regulation eventually came was because of our right to digital sovereignty, even if no one used that phrase at the time. Today we have AI, and if social media is anything to go by, the consensus is that we need protections for users now, not later. It may feel premature to predict the full impact. But as we step into this new era, the responsibility falls on innovators to assess and communicate regularly, specifically, in-app, how they are protecting users given what we already know. A conversation with all stakeholders needs to take place at every level: macro, meso, and micro.
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker