Technology’s Effect on Advocacy
manner consistent with California's longstanding commitment to protecting children's development.
through early childhood (Cal. Health & Saf. Code § 130100), to the Child Welfare Services Act, whose purpose is to protect and promote children's welfare by preventing abuse, exploitation, and other conditions that threaten healthy development (Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 16501), California law repeatedly recognizes that protecting children means creating the conditions necessary for healthy development—not merely responding after harm has already occurred. That same philosophy is reflected in one of California's most fundamental child-protection doctrines: the best interest of the child. Although the doctrine traditionally governs custody, dependency, and child-protection proceedings, it also reflects California's broader policy of protecting children's health, safety, and development. While it does not itself govern AI litigation, it provides a useful interpretive framework for evaluating legal questions involving children's developmental interests. (Cal. Fam. Code § 3011). That principle carries particular significance in the context of artificial intelligence. The concern presented by AI in classrooms is not limited to data collection or privacy. Unlike many traditional tort injuries, these harms may be gradual, developmental, and difficult to identify until years after the technology has shaped the child's educational experience. California's longstanding commitment to children's healthy development therefore provides important context for evaluating the legal implications of AI. Although that policy does not itself create duties for AI developers or schools, it helps explain why California increasingly regulates technologies capable of affecting children's development.
Protecting Under California Law: Principles, Mechanisms, and the Challenge of Artificial Intelligence Children's Development How does California law conceptualize children's development, and why does that matter for AI litigation? Those questions are critical because schools are not simply places where children acquire knowledge. They are environments specifically designed to foster children's cognitive, emotional, and social development. When artificial intelligence becomes part of that environment, the legal inquiry cannot be limited to whether an AI system functions properly or complies with existing privacy regulations. It must also ask a more fundamental question: does technology promote or interfere with the developmental objectives that education is intended to achieve? Understanding what legal practitioners can do in response to AI-related harm requires looking beyond technology-specific regulations. It requires examining the broader principles that have long guided California's protection of children. Those principles reveal a consistent legislative and judicial commitment to safeguarding children's development, well-being, and long-term welfare. California's child-protection framework has never been limited to preventing immediate physical harm. Across family law, dependency law, public health, and child welfare legislation, the state has consistently adopted a developmental approach to childhood. From the California Children and Families Act of 1998, which established an integrated system to promote optimal child development from the prenatal stage
California's Emerging AI Framework
62
Consumer Attorneys of California
FORUM September/October 2026
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs