10/21/20
State Regulation
› Some compacts provide for the State to be heavily involved in regulatory issues such as licensure. Arizona compacts require state certification of certain gaming licenses › Others adopt a more “hands- off” approach and defer almost entirely to the tribal gaming regulatory agency › And others, such as the Oklahoma Model Tribal-State Compact, strike a middle- ground approach
Differences Between Tribal-State Compacts
9
Internal Controls • Some compacts adopt or use the NIGC MICS as guidance Technical Standards • Some states have required the adoption of additional technical standards for Class III games • These standards then become part of the Tribe’s gaming laws
Differences Between Tribal-State Compacts
10
5
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs