Calculus Volume 1

Chapter 2 | Limits

197

In this part of the proof, we started with | (2 x +1)−3 | and used our assumption 0< | x −1| < δ in a key part of the chain of inequalities to get | (2 x +1)−3 | to be less than ε . We could just as easily have manipulated the assumed inequality 0< | x −1| < δ to arrive at | (2 x +1)−3 | < ε as follows: 0< | x −1| < δ ⇒ | x −1| < δ ⇒ − δ < x −1< δ ⇒ − ε 2 < x −1< ε 2

⇒ − ε <2 x −2< ε ⇒ − ε <2 x −2< ε ⇒ |2 x −2| < ε ⇒ | (2 x +1)−3 | < ε .

(2 x +1) =3. (Having completed the proof, we state what we have accomplished.)

Therefore, lim x →1

After removing all the remarks, here is a final version of the proof: Let ε >0. Choose δ = ε /2. Assume 0< | x −1| < δ . Thus, | (2 x +1)−3 | = |2 x −2|

= | 2( x −1) | = |2|| x −1| =2| x −1|

<2· δ =2· ε 2 = ε .

(2 x +1) =3.

Therefore, lim x →1

The following Problem-Solving Strategy summarizes the type of proof we worked out in Example 2.39 .

x → a f ( x ) = L

for a Specific Function f ( x )

Problem-Solving Strategy: Proving That lim

1. Let’s begin the proof with the following statement: Let ε >0. 2. Next, we need to obtain a value for δ . After we have obtained this value, we make the following statement, filling in the blank with our choice of δ : Choose δ =_______. 3. The next statement in the proof should be (at this point, we fill in our given value for a ): Assume 0< | x − a | < δ . 4. Next, based on this assumption, we need to show that | f ( x )− L | < ε , where f ( x ) and L are our function f ( x ) and our limit L . At some point, we need to use 0< | x − a | < δ . 5. We conclude our proof with the statement: Therefore, lim x → a f ( x ) = L .

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online