Internet Speech & the Regulation of big tech • Gonzales v. Google – Are interactive computer services immune from civil suit related to their targeted recommendations of information provided by another information content provider? • Twitter v. Taamneh – Are interactive computer services immune from civil liability for “aiding and abetting” terrorism if pro-terrorism content appears on their platforms? – Are interactive computer services immune from civil suit related to their targeted recommendations of information provided by another information content provider? • Twitter v. Taamneh – Are interactive computer services immune from civil liability for “aiding and abetting” terrorism if pro-terrorism content appears on their platforms? Internet Speech & the Regulation of big tech • Gonzales v. Google – Are interactive computer services immune from civil suit related to their targeted recommendations of information provided by another information content provider? • Twitter v. Taamneh – Are interactive computer services immune from civil liability for “aiding and abetting” terrorism if pro-terrorism content appears on their platforms? Internet Speech & the Regulation of big tech • Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act – Interactive computer services enjoy broad immunity from civil suits in which liability arises from user-generated content . Internet Speech & the Regulation of big tech • Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act – Interactive computer services enjoy broad immunity from civil suits in which liability arises from user-generated content . • Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act – Interactive computer services enjoy broad immunity from civil suits in which liability arises from user-generated content . Internet Speech & the Regulation of big tech Conclusions • In law, as in business, change is the only constant. • The new, emboldened 6-3 conservative majority has shown no aversion to overruling prior precedent. Conclusions • In law, as in business, change is the only constant. • The new, emboldened 6-3 conservative majority has shown no aversion to overruling prior precedent. • As gaps between red & blue America widen expect more regulation and litigation. Conclusions • In law, as in business, change is the only constant. • As gaps between red & blue America widen expect more regulation and litigation. • The new, emboldened 6-3 conservative majority has shown no aversion to overruling prior precedent.
15
15
15
16
16
16
17
Central Wisconsin Report - Fall 2022
25
• As gaps between red & blue America widen expect more regulation and litigation.
17
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog